devm_devfreq...opp_notifier(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… devm_devfreq...opp_notifier(9) πŸ’…

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes that's the manual name, and yes it's giving very "official business" energy, but we're gonna make it cute. this page is literally about devm_devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier, and the title is spelled all fancy like devm_devfreq...opp_notifier(9) because kernel docs love a dramatic ellipsis ✨


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

so the function is devm_devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier β€” it's the resource-managed version of devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(). like, the devm-prefixed glow-up. no cap πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

here's the whole entire signature, character for character, do not touch:

void devm_devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier (struct device *dev , struct devfreq *devfreq );

that's it. that's the vibe. she takes two pointers and returns void β€” nothing back, just vibes πŸ¦‹


🧚 ARGUMENTS 🧚

two parameters, both iconic, both mandatory:

  • dev β€” the devfreq user device. and plot twist: it's the parent of devfreq. so it's giving main character energy with a whole child object attached πŸ’…
  • devfreq β€” the devfreq object itself. the actual star of the show πŸ”₯

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

okay this is the long part and we are NOT skipping a single one, because the kernel file is ./drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c and it's lowkey a whole friend group 🫢

Kernel file ./drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c, plus all of these besties:

like, that's the whole roster. collect them all 🌈⭐


reminder bestie: this is the devm one, so the unregistering is resource-managed β€” that's literally what the NAME says. don't go confusing her with the plain devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(9), iykyk πŸ’€

and that's the page!! πŸ“ source is ./drivers/devfreq, dated October 2026, and the page footer is exactly devm_devfreq...opp_notifier(9) β€” she said periodt and logged off πŸ«ΆπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from