devm_clk_hw...factor_index(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– devm_clk_hw...factor_index(9) πŸ’–

okay so bestie, this is a Kernel API Manual page, and the full function name is devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index β€” it's giving "Register a fixed factor clock with parent from DT index" realness. no cap, that's literally the whole point. πŸ¦‹


✨ NAME ✨

devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index β€” Register a fixed factor clock with parent from DT index. periodt. πŸ’…

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

the signature said what it said, and here it is exactly:

       struct clk_hw * devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index (struct device
       *dev , const char *name , unsigned int index , unsigned long flags ,
       unsigned int mult , unsigned int div );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • dev β€” device that is registering this clock. literally the device doing the registration, bestie.
  • name β€” name of this clock. yes, the name-name. 🏷️
  • index β€” index of phandle in dev 'clocks' property. iykyk. πŸ”Ž
  • flags β€” fixed factor flags. flag moment. 🚩
  • mult β€” multiplier. math girlie behavior. βœ–οΈ
  • div β€” divider. divide and slay. βž—

πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

Pointer to the fixed factor clk_hw structure that was registered, or an error pointer. that's the return vibe, bestie. πŸ”₯

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

go give these a look, iykyk. 🫢


mwah πŸ’‹ β€” source/version is ./drivers/clk / devm_clk_hw...factor_index(9), dated October 2026. byeee 🫢

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from