devl_dpipe_...s_unregister(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… devl_dpipe_...s_unregister(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie

okay so picture this: you're deep in the kernel, you've got a devlink situation, and it's time to say bye-bye to some headers. this page is literally the whole glow-up guide for that. it lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's short, sweet, and to the point β€” main character energy, no filler. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

devl_dpipe_headers_unregister β€” unregister dpipe headers

like, it does exactly what it says on the tin, no cap. 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void devl_dpipe_headers_unregister (struct devlink *devlink );

that's it. that's the whole vibe. one function, one argument, zero drama. πŸ’œ


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • devlink β€” a devlink. yes, the argument is literally named devlink and its description is literally devlink. it's giving "the assignment describes itself." iconic, honestly. 😭

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

Unregister the headers supported by hardware.

so the hardware was out here supporting some headers, and now we're unregistering them. closing the tab, logging off, exiting the group chat. the headers had their moment and it was beautiful, but we're moving on. periodt. πŸ’…βœ¨

fr fr, this is the counterpart to registering β€” think of it as the "undo" button for hardware-supported headers. 🧚

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘


okay bestie that's the page!! short king energy, we love to see it. this whole thing came to you from ./net/devlink and it's dated October 2026 β€” mark your calendars, screenshot it, put it on your fridge, it's iconic. bye bye, go unregister those headers responsibly πŸ’…πŸ«ΆπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from