cpu_latency_...quest_active(9)
π cpu_latency_...quest_active(9) π
okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one is a tiny little function that's basically the vibe check for a PM QoS request π it's short, it's sweet, it's giving "one job and she does it." Let's go β¨
β¨ NAME β¨
cpu_latency_qos_request_active β lowkey just checks the given PM QoS request. That's it. That's the whole assignment π«Ά
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
bool cpu_latency_qos_request_active (struct pm_qos_request *req );
it returns a bool, takes a struct pm_qos_request * named req, and honestly? icon behavior π
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
reqβ the PM QoS request you want checked. that's the one, that's the girl π
π« RETURN π«
the manpage says: otherwise.
and ngl bestie, that's literally all it says π no cap, that's the entire return section. we move π§
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
the kernel file in question is ./kernel/power/qos.c and here's the whole friend group, no one left out fr fr:
pm_qos_read_value(9)pm_qos_update_target(9)pm_qos_flags_remove_req(9)pm_qos_update_flags(9)cpu_latency_qos_limit(9)cpu_latency_qos_add_request(9)cpu_latency_qos_update_request(9)cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(9)cpu_wakeup_latency_qos_limit(9)freq_constraints_init(9)freq_qos_read_value(9)freq_qos_apply(9)freq_qos_add_request(9)freq_qos_update_request(9)freq_qos_remove_request(9)freq_qos_add_notifier(9)freq_qos_remove_notifier(9)
π quick reminder bestie: this page is from./kernel/power, dated October 2026, and the header up top iscpu_latency_...quest_active(9)β yes the dots are part of it, don't come for me π
and that's the whole page, mwah π stay hydrated, read your qos.c, periodt πβ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms