cpu_latency_...quest_active(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸŽ€ cpu_latency_...quest_active(9) πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one is a tiny little function that's basically the vibe check for a PM QoS request πŸ’… it's short, it's sweet, it's giving "one job and she does it." Let's go ✨


✨ NAME ✨

cpu_latency_qos_request_active β€” lowkey just checks the given PM QoS request. That's it. That's the whole assignment 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool cpu_latency_qos_request_active (struct pm_qos_request *req );

it returns a bool, takes a struct pm_qos_request * named req, and honestly? icon behavior πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • req β€” the PM QoS request you want checked. that's the one, that's the girl πŸ’–

πŸ’« RETURN πŸ’«

the manpage says: otherwise.

and ngl bestie, that's literally all it says 😭 no cap, that's the entire return section. we move 🧚


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the kernel file in question is ./kernel/power/qos.c and here's the whole friend group, no one left out fr fr:


πŸ’€ quick reminder bestie: this page is from ./kernel/power, dated October 2026, and the header up top is cpu_latency_...quest_active(9) β€” yes the dots are part of it, don't come for me πŸ™ˆ

and that's the whole page, mwah πŸ’‹ stay hydrated, read your qos.c, periodt 🌈⭐

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from