cfg802154_de...s_associated(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– cfg802154_device_is_associated β€” a Kernel API Manual moment (section 9, bestie)

okay so picture this: you're deep in the 9 section of the Kernel API Manual, right, and you just need to know one thing β€” is this wpan device, like, associated to literally anyone? That's the whole vibe of this page. It's a check. That's it. And it eats. πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

cfg802154_device_is_associated β€” checks whether we are associated to any device 🫢

Like, not "which device", not "how many devices", not "why is this device like this". Just: are we associated? Yes or no. Iconic minimalism tbh.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool cfg802154_device_is_associated (struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev );

that's the whole thing. one function, one pointer, one bool coming back at you. no cap. ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • wpan_dev β€” the wpan device πŸ’– (literally just the device we're checking, she's the main character of this call)

⭐ RETURN ⭐

true if we are associated 🌈

and that's the only thing this page promises you, bestie β€” so don't go reading extra meaning into it, iykyk. If we're associated, you get true. 🧚


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Kernel file ./include/net/cfg802154.h β€” go read it, she's right there πŸ‘‘

and all the besties in the family:

like, the whole friend group showed up. obsessed. πŸ”₯


okay that's the page!! πŸ’œ it lives under ./include/net, it's dated October 2026, and yeah β€” the title up there really does get abbreviated to cfg802154_de...s_associated(9) because kernel function names are long and the manpage header said what it said. periodt. πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from