bpf_wakeup_s...es_read_lock(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

bpf_wakeup_s...es_read_lock(9)

okay bestie, this is the Kernel API Manual page for bpf_wakeup_s...es_read_lock(9) β€” yes, the name is a whole mouthful, but we're gonna get through it together 🫢✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock β€” acquire the SRCU lock for wakeup sources. that's the whole vibe πŸ’…

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

__bpf_kfunc struct bpf_ws_lock * bpf_wakeup_sources_read_lock (void );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • void β€” no arguments. not a single one. it's giving "I travel light" πŸ’€

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so the underlying SRCU lock returns an integer index. but the BPF verifier is highkey strict: it requires a pointer (PTR_TO_BTF_ID) to strictly track the state of acquired resources using KF_ACQUIRE and KF_RELEASE semantics.

that's where the opaque structure pointer (struct bpf_ws_lock *) comes in β€” it satisfies the verifier while safely encoding the integer index within the pointer address itself. iconic little trick, no cap ✨

πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

an opaque pointer encoding the SRCU lock index + 1 (to avoid NULL). that + 1 is doing important work, bestie β€” no NULL energy allowed πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./drivers/base/power/wakeup.c:


signed off with source/version ./drivers/base/power and the date October 2026 β€” catch you in bpf_wakeup_s...es_read_lock(9) land, bestie πŸ«ΆπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from