arm_smccc_get_version(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– arm_smccc_get_version πŸ’–

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual β€” yes, the actual kernel docs, bestie, we're reading kernel docs today and we're gonna have a good time 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

arm_smccc_get_version β€” and honestly the original leaves the description blank after the dash, so like... that's it. That's the whole name section. Iconic minimalism, no notes πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

u32 arm_smccc_get_version (void );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • void β€” no arguments. none. zero. the call takes nothing from you, she works alone, main character energy fr fr πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so what does she actually do? she returns the version to be used for SMCCCv1.1 or later ✨ that's the version number you get back, that's the vibe check result, that's the whole job.

and here's the important part, bestie, listen up πŸ™ˆ β€” when SMCCCv1.1 or above is not present, she returns SMCCCv1.0. but β€” and this is the lowkey crucial bit β€” that does not imply the presence of firmware or a valid conduit. like, at all. it's literally just saying "bestie this is at most v1.0 territory," not "bestie the firmware is definitely there and everything is fine."

so if you're a caller handling SMCCCv1.0, you have to determine the conduit by other means. that's on you, not on her. she's not gonna hold your hand on this one 🫢

⚠️ real talk: don't read the v1.0 return value as proof of firmware or a conduit. it isn't. figure that out separately, okay? no cap πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

like the whole SMCCC friend group showed up to the group chat πŸ’œ


and that's the page!! πŸŽ€ she lives in ./include/linux and this version is dated October 2026 β€” so yeah, future-dated kernel lore, obsessed ⭐ slay, go call your conduits responsibly bestie πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from