SYSTEMD.SLICE(5)
โจ NAME โจ
systemd.slice โ slice unit configuration ๐
okay bestie, gather round, because this one is about slice units and it's genuinely iconic once it clicks ๐ซถ
๐ธ SYNOPSIS ๐ธ
slice.slice
๐ฆ DESCRIPTION ๐ฆ
So a unit config file whose name ends in .slice is encoding the tea about a slice unit. And what even IS a slice unit? It's a concept for hierarchically managing resources of a group of processes โจ. How does it do that? By creating a node in the Linux Control Group (cgroup) tree ๐ณ.
Units that manage processes (primarily scope and service units) may be assigned to a specific slice. And for each slice, certain resource limits may be set that apply to all the processes of all the units contained in that slice ๐ฅ.
Slices are organized hierarchically in a tree. The name of the slice encodes the location in the tree. The name consists of a dash-separated series of names, which describes the path to the slice from the root slice. The root slice is named -.slice ๐.
Example, because we love a concrete moment: foo-bar.slice is a slice that is located within foo.slice, which in turn is located in the root slice -.slice. It's giving family tree, it's giving nesting ๐
๐จ Note that slice units cannot be templated, nor is it possible to add multiple names to a slice unit by creating additional symlinks to its unit file. No cap.
By default, service and scope units are placed in system.slice, virtual machines and containers registered with systemd-machined(8) are found in machine.slice, and user sessions handled by systemd-logind(8) in user.slice. See systemd.special(7) for more information ๐
See systemd.unit(5) for the common options of all unit configuration files. The common configuration items are configured in the generic [Unit] and [Install] sections. The slice specific configuration options are configured in the [Slice] section. Currently, only generic resource control settings as described in systemd.resource-control(5) are allowed ๐
See the New Control Group Interfaces[1] for an introduction on how to make use of slice units from programs ๐
๐ AUTOMATIC DEPENDENCIES ๐
๐ Implicit Dependencies
The following dependencies are implicitly added, no input from you required, they just happen:
- Slice units automatically gain dependencies of type
After=andRequires=on their immediate parent slice unit. Parental supervision, but make it cgroups ๐ซถ
โญ Default Dependencies
The following dependencies are added unless DefaultDependencies=no is set:
- Slice units will automatically have dependencies of type
Conflicts=andBefore=onshutdown.target. These ensure that slice units are removed prior to system shutdown ๐ Only slice units involved with late system shutdown should disableDefaultDependencies=option.
๐ OPTIONS ๐
Slice unit files may include [Unit] and [Install] sections, which are described in systemd.unit(5).
Slice files may include a [Slice] section. Many options that may be used in this section are shared with other unit types. These options are documented in systemd.resource-control(5).
The options specific to the [Slice] section of slice units are the following, and honestly? They're the moment:
ConcurrencyHardMax=,ConcurrencySoftMax=โ Configures a hard and a soft limit on the maximum number of units assigned to this slice (or any descendent slices) that may be active at the same time.
If the hard limit is reached, no further units associated with the slice may be activated, and their activation will fail with an error ๐
If the soft limit is reached, any further requested activation of units will be queued, but no immediate error is generated. The queued activation job will remain queued until the number of concurrent active units within the slice is below the limit again. It's just vibing in the queue, waiting its turn ๐ฐ๏ธ
If the special value "infinity" is specified, no concurrency limit is enforced. This is the default.
Note that if multiple start jobs are queued for units, and all their dependencies are fulfilled they'll be processed in an order that is dependent on the unit type, the CPU weight (for unit types that know the concept, such as services), the nice level (similar), and finally in alphabetical order by the unit name. This may be used to influence dispatching order when using ConcurrencySoftMax= to pace concurrency within a slice unit ๐
Note that these options have a hierarchial effect: a limit set for a slice unit will apply to both the units immediately within the slice, but also all units further down the slice tree ๐ณ Also note that each sub-slice unit counts as one unit each too, and thus when choosing a limit for a slice hierarchy the limit must provide room for both the payload units (i.e. services, mounts, ...) and structural units (i.e. slice units), if any are defined. Do the math bestie, budget for both ๐งฎ
Added in version 258.
ActivatingConcurrencyMax=โ Configures a limit on the maximum number of units assigned to this slice (or any descendent slices) that may be in the activating state at the same time. UnlikeConcurrencySoftMax=which limits units in the active state, this option limits units while they are starting up ๐ฃ Once a unit leaves the activating state (whether to active, failed, or any other state), it no longer counts toward this limit, allowing the next queued unit to begin starting.
This is particularly useful for managing the "thundering herd" problem during system boot, where many long-running services (such as container workloads) attempt to start simultaneously ๐๐จ By setting ActivatingConcurrencyMax=, you can pace the startup process to limit CPU and I/O pressure, while still allowing all services to eventually reach the active state.
When the limit is reached, further activation requests are queued and will be dispatched automatically once running activations complete. No error is returned to the caller. Note that if a unit becomes stuck in the activating state (for example, due to a hung process or missing dependency), it will continue to occupy a slot until it leaves that state ๐ญ Configure appropriate timeouts (e.g., TimeoutStartSec=) on individual units to prevent indefinite blocking. Do not let it rot in there, set a timeout ๐ซ
Setting ActivatingConcurrencyMax=0 blocks all activation requests in the slice hierarchy indefinitely. Queued units will never start until the limit is raised. This can be used to intentionally freeze slice startup, matching the behavior of ConcurrencySoftMax=0 ๐ง
If the special value "infinity" is specified, no concurrency limit is enforced. This is the default.
Note that this option has a hierarchical effect: a limit set for a slice unit will apply to both the units immediately within the slice and all units further down the slice tree ๐ฒ Note that slice units themselves never enter the activating state, so nested slices do not count toward the limit.
Added in version 262.
๐ SEE ALSO ๐
systemd(1)systemd.unit(5)systemd.resource-control(5)systemd.service(5)systemd.scope(5)systemd.special(7)systemd.directives(7)
๐ NOTES ๐
- New Control Group Interfaces
https://systemd.io/CONTROL_GROUP_INTERFACE
okay and that's the whole page bestie, you ate it ๐ this is systemd.slice from systemd 262.1 โ go forth and nest your slices responsibly, ily, bye ๐โจ
๐ฆ where this page comes from
- arch rolling: systemd 262.1-1 ยท LGPL-2.1-or-later AND CC0-1.0 AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT-0
- ๐ girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms