X509_STORE_CTX_GET0_CURRENT_ISSUER(3ssl)
โจ X509_STORE_CTX_GET_ERROR โ the get-or-set certificate verification status info page โจ
okay bestie, welcome to the OpenSSL library functions manual ๐
this page lives in section 3 (library functions), and today we're deep-diving X509_STORE_CTX_get_error and its whole friend group. no cap, this is the "what went wrong during cert verification and how do I look at it" page.
๐ธ NAME ๐ธ
X509_STORE_CTX_get_error, X509_STORE_CTX_set_error, X509_STORE_CTX_get_error_depth, X509_STORE_CTX_set_error_depth, X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert, X509_STORE_CTX_set_current_cert, X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_issuer, X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_crl, X509_STORE_CTX_get0_parent_ctx, X509_STORE_CTX_get_num_untrusted, X509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain, X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain, X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain, X509_STORE_CTX_set0_verified_chain, X509_verify_cert_error_string โ get or set certificate verification status information ๐
like, the whole squad. every one of them. that's the vibe.
โจ SYNOPSIS โจ
#include <openssl/x509_vfy.h>
int
X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
void
X509_STORE_CTX_set_error(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx, int s);
int
X509_STORE_CTX_get_error_depth(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
void
X509_STORE_CTX_set_error_depth(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx, int depth);
X509 *
X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
void
X509_STORE_CTX_set_current_cert(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx, X509 *cert);
X509 *
X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_issuer(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
X509_CRL *
X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_crl(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
X509_STORE_CTX *
X509_STORE_CTX_get0_parent_ctx(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
int
X509_STORE_CTX_get_num_untrusted(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
STACK_OF(X509) *
X509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
STACK_OF(X509) *
X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
STACK_OF(X509) *
X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx);
void
X509_STORE_CTX_set0_verified_chain(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx,
STACK_OF(X509) *chain);
#include <openssl/x509.h>
const char *
X509_verify_cert_error_string(long n);
two different headers bestie, don't forget the second #include โ X509_verify_cert_error_string lives in <openssl/x509.h> while the rest are in <openssl/x509_vfy.h>. iykyk ๐ฆ
๐ DESCRIPTION ๐
so the way that most of these functions work: you call them after X509_verify_cert(3) to peek at the status info from your certificate verification. some of them you can also call inside a verification callback to figure out what kind of error you're dealing with. it's giving detective energy ๐
X509_STORE_CTX_get_error()โ returns the error code ofctx. literally just the error code. head over to the ERROR CODES section for a full description of all the error codes (all of them, we're not skipping any).X509_STORE_CTX_set_error()โ sets the error code ofctxtos. for example, you might use this in a verification callback to set an error based on additional checks you did yourself. main character move ๐X509_STORE_CTX_get_error_depth()โ returns the depth of the error. this is a non-negative integer telling you where in the certificate chain the error happened. if it's zero, it went down in the end entity certificate; one means it's the certificate which signed the end entity certificate; and so on up the chain. โญX509_STORE_CTX_set_error_depth()โ sets the error depth. use it together withX509_STORE_CTX_set_error()to set the depth at which an error condition was detected. team work makes the dream work ๐ซถX509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert()โ returns the certificate inctxwhich caused the error, orNULLif no certificate is relevant.X509_STORE_CTX_set_current_cert()โ sets the certificate which caused the error inctxto the givencert. โ ๏ธ important: this value is not intended to stay valid for very long, and it remains owned by the caller. a verification callback invoked to handle each error encountered during chain verification may examine it, and it's no longer required after such a callback returns. if your callback wants to save the certificate for use after it returns, you need to bump its reference count viaX509_up_ref(3). once that saved certificate is no longer needed, free it withX509_free(3). no take-backsies on ownership, bestie ๐X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_issuer()โ returns the certificate that caused issuer validation to fail, orNULLif no CA certificate is relevant.X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_crl()โ returns the certificate revocation list that caused CRL checking to fail, orNULLif no CRL is relevant.X509_STORE_CTX_get0_parent_ctx()โ okay this one's a whole situation, pay attention ๐ง when, during certification path validation, the need arises to check the validity of the certification path of a CRL issuer certificate, the library creates a new, temporaryX509_STORE_CTXobject. if you callX509_STORE_CTX_get0_parent_ctx()on that temporary object, you get a pointer to the original certification path validation context back. this is useful in callback functions called fromX509_verify_cert(3)or from its subroutines โ it lets you find out whether the callback is being called from the path validation of the target certificate or from the path validation of a related CRL issuer certificate, and if it's the latter, what the target certificate actually is. iconic little context telescope ๐ญX509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain()โ returns an internal pointer to a complete validated chain if a previous call toX509_verify_cert(3)was successful. but โ if that call toX509_verify_cert(3)was not successful, the returned chain may be incomplete or invalid. proceed accordingly ๐ญX509_STORE_CTX_get_chain()โ a deprecated alias ofX509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain(). use the0one, bestie, it ate.X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain()โ returns a deep copy of the same chain, which persists even after thectxstructure is freed. when you don't need it anymore, free it usingsk_X509_pop_free(chain, X509_free). the1means "you own this now" ๐X509_STORE_CTX_set0_verified_chain()โ frees the validated chain generated by a previous call toX509_verify_cert(3), if any, and replaces it with the givenchain. ownership of the chain is transferred to thectx, so do not free it yourself. it's the ctx's problem now ๐X509_verify_cert_error_string()โ returns a human readable error string for verification errorn. yes, human readable, we love an accessible error message ๐
also, real talk: use the above functions instead of directly referencing the fields in the X509_VERIFY_CTX structure. fr fr, don't poke the struct yourself.
in versions of OpenSSL before 1.0, the current certificate returned by X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert() was never NULL. so applications should check the return value before printing out any debugging information relating to the current certificate โ yes, even though old code got away with not checking. glow-up rules now โจ
and if an unrecognised error code gets passed to X509_verify_cert_error_string(), "Unknown certificate verification error" is returned. this should never happen unless an invalid code is passed. so like, if you see it, something's up ๐
๐ฆ RETURN VALUES ๐ฆ
X509_STORE_CTX_get_error()returnsX509_V_OKor an error code.X509_STORE_CTX_get_error_depth()returns a non-negative error depth.X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert(),X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_issuer(), andX509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_crl()return the object which caused the error, orNULLif no object of the requested kind is relevant to the error.X509_STORE_CTX_get0_parent_ctx()returns the parent context, orNULLifctxis not a temporary child context used for path validation of a CRL issuer certificate.X509_STORE_CTX_get_num_untrusted()returns the number of untrusted certificates that were used in building the chain during a call toX509_verify_cert(3).X509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain(),X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain(), andX509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain()return a pointer to a stack of certificates, orNULLif an error occurs.X509_verify_cert_error_string()returns a human readable error string for verification errorn.
that's the return value tea โ and there's more page coming, so don't go anywhere bestie ๐
๐ ERROR CODES ๐
okay bestie, here's the whole alphabet of heartbreak โ every error code and its message, listed below ๐ธ. Heads up: some of these codes are defined but currently never returned, and those ones get described as "unused". So if you see "unused" next to one, that's why โ it's giving ghost ๐ป.
X509_V_OK: ok โ literally the only good ending ๐. The operation was successful.X509_V_ERR_UNSPECIFIED: Unspecified certificate verification error โ something went wrong during certificate verification and the internal routines failed to set a more specific error. Not them being vague on purpose, they just couldn't pin it down ๐ญ.X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT: unable to get issuer certificate โ the issuer certificate of a locally looked up certificate could not be found. This normally means the list of trusted certificates is not complete. Like a group chat missing the one person who knows what's going on ๐ซ .X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL: unable to get certificate CRL โ the CRL of a certificate could not be found.X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_DECRYPT_CERT_SIGNATURE: unable to decrypt certificate's signature โ the certificate signature could not be decrypted. Real talk: this means the actual signature value could not be determined, rather than it not matching the expected value. And this one is only meaningful for RSA keys, iykyk ๐.X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_DECRYPT_CRL_SIGNATURE: unable to decrypt CRL's signature โ the CRL signature could not be decrypted: this means the actual signature value could not be determined rather than it not matching the expected value. Unused. ๐X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_DECODE_ISSUER_PUBLIC_KEY: unable to decode issuer public key โ the public key in the certificate SubjectPublicKeyInfo could not be read.X509_V_ERR_CERT_SIGNATURE_FAILURE: certificate signature failure โ the signature of the certificate is invalid. Not the vibe ๐ง๏ธ.X509_V_ERR_CRL_SIGNATURE_FAILURE: CRL signature failure โ the signature of the CRL is invalid.X509_V_ERR_CERT_NOT_YET_VALID: certificate is not yet valid โ the certificate is not yet valid: the notBefore date is after the current time. She's early, she's not ready, come back later โฐ.X509_V_ERR_CERT_HAS_EXPIRED: certificate has expired โ the certificate has expired: that is the notAfter date is before the current time. She's late, she's gone ๐ชฆ.X509_V_ERR_CRL_NOT_YET_VALID: CRL is not yet valid โ the CRL is not yet valid.X509_V_ERR_CRL_HAS_EXPIRED: CRL has expired โ the CRL has expired.X509_V_ERR_ERROR_IN_CERT_NOT_BEFORE_FIELD: format error in certificate's notBefore field โ the certificate notBefore field contains an invalid time.X509_V_ERR_ERROR_IN_CERT_NOT_AFTER_FIELD: format error in certificate's notAfter field โ the certificate notAfter field contains an invalid time.X509_V_ERR_ERROR_IN_CRL_LAST_UPDATE_FIELD: format error in CRL's lastUpdate field โ the CRL thisUpdate field (sic!) contains an invalid time. Yes bestie, the manpage really does say "sic" โ because both the name of the error constant and the text of the error message give a wrong name for the field that actually contains the problem ๐. Iconic behaviour, honestly.X509_V_ERR_ERROR_IN_CRL_NEXT_UPDATE_FIELD: format error in CRL's nextUpdate field โ the CRL nextUpdate field contains an invalid time.X509_V_ERR_OUT_OF_MEM: out of memory โ an error occurred trying to allocate memory. This should never happen ๐ค.X509_V_ERR_DEPTH_ZERO_SELF_SIGNED_CERT: self signed certificate โ the passed certificate is self signed and the same certificate cannot be found in the list of trusted certificates. Main character who refuses to be in anyone's contacts ๐ .X509_V_ERR_SELF_SIGNED_CERT_IN_CHAIN: self signed certificate in certificate chain โ the certificate chain could be built up using the untrusted certificates but the root could not be found locally.X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY: unable to get local issuer certificate โ the issuer certificate could not be found: this occurs if the issuer certificate of an untrusted certificate cannot be found.X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE: unable to verify the first certificate โ no signatures could be verified because the chain contains only one certificate and it is not self signed. A chain of one is not a chain, it's a solo outing ๐ง.X509_V_ERR_CERT_CHAIN_TOO_LONG: certificate chain too long โ the certificate chain length is greater than the supplied maximum depth. Too much lore, not enough runtime ๐.X509_V_ERR_CERT_REVOKED: certificate revoked โ the certificate has been revoked. Uninvited ๐ซ.X509_V_ERR_INVALID_CA: invalid CA certificate โ a CA certificate is invalid. Either it is not a CA or its extensions are not consistent with the supplied purpose.X509_V_ERR_PATH_LENGTH_EXCEEDED: path length constraint exceeded โ the basicConstraints path-length parameter has been exceeded.X509_V_ERR_INVALID_PURPOSE: unsupported certificate purpose โ the supplied certificate cannot be used for the specified purpose. Wrong job, wrong girl ๐.X509_V_ERR_CERT_UNTRUSTED: certificate not trusted โ the root CA is not marked as trusted for the specified purpose.X509_V_ERR_CERT_REJECTED: certificate rejected โ the root CA is marked to reject the specified purpose. It's not a no, it's a marked no ๐ฅ.X509_V_ERR_SUBJECT_ISSUER_MISMATCH: subject issuer mismatch โ the current candidate issuer certificate was rejected because its subject name did not match the issuer name of the current certificate. This is only set if issuer check debugging is enabled; it is used for status notification and is not in itself an error โจ.X509_V_ERR_AKID_SKID_MISMATCH: authority and subject key identifier mismatch โ the current candidate issuer certificate was rejected because its subject key identifier was present and did not match the authority key identifier current certificate. This is only set if issuer check debugging is enabled; it is used for status notification and is not in itself an error.X509_V_ERR_AKID_ISSUER_SERIAL_MISMATCH: authority and issuer serial number mismatch โ the current candidate issuer certificate was rejected because its issuer name and serial number was present and did not match the authority key identifier of the current certificate. This is only set if issuer check debugging is enabled; it is used for status notification and is not in itself an error.X509_V_ERR_KEYUSAGE_NO_CERTSIGN: key usage does not include certificate signing โ the current candidate issuer certificate was rejected because its keyUsage extension does not permit certificate signing. This is only set if issuer check debugging is enabled it is used for status notification and is not in itself an error (yes, that run-on sentence is the original's, and yes, I'm keeping it ๐ซถ).X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL_ISSUER: unable to get CRL issuer certificate โ the CRL's issuer could not be found: there is no alternative CRL issuer set on ctx and the last certificate in the chain is not self signed.X509_V_ERR_UNHANDLED_CRITICAL_EXTENSION: unhandled critical extension โ the certificate contains a critical extension that is unsupported by the library.X509_V_ERR_KEYUSAGE_NO_CRL_SIGN: key usage does not include CRL signing โ the CRL issuer has a key usage extension with unsetcRLSignbit.X509_V_ERR_UNHANDLED_CRITICAL_CRL_EXTENSION: unhandled critical CRL extension โ the CRL contains a critical extension that is unsupported by the library.X509_V_ERR_INVALID_EXTENSION: invalid or inconsistent certificate extension โ a certificate extension had an invalid value (for example an incorrect encoding) or some value inconsistent with other extensions.X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION: invalid or inconsistent certificate policy extension โ a certificate policies extension had an invalid value (for example an incorrect encoding) or some value inconsistent with other extensions. This error only occurs if policy processing is enabled ๐.X509_V_ERR_NO_EXPLICIT_POLICY: no explicit policy โ the verification flags were set to require an explicit policy but none was present.X509_V_ERR_DIFFERENT_CRL_SCOPE: different CRL scope โ the only CRLs that could be found did not match the scope of the certificate.X509_V_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_EXTENSION_FEATURE: unsupported extension feature โ some feature of a certificate extension is not supported. Unused. ๐X509_V_ERR_UNNESTED_RESOURCE: RFC 3779 resource not subset of parent's resources โ when walking up a certificate chain, all resources specified in RFC 3779 extensions must be contained in the resources delegated in the issuer's RFC 3779 extensions. The error indicates that this is not the case or that the trust anchor has inheritance ๐ช.X509_V_ERR_PERMITTED_VIOLATION: permitted subtree violation โ a name constraint violation occurred in the permitted subtrees.X509_V_ERR_EXCLUDED_VIOLATION: excluded subtree violation โ a name constraint violation occurred in the excluded subtrees.X509_V_ERR_SUBTREE_MINMAX: name constraints minimum and maximum not supported โ a certificate name constraints extension included a minimum or maximum field: this is not supported.X509_V_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_CONSTRAINT_TYPE: unsupported name constraint type โ an unsupported name constraint type was encountered. OpenSSL currently only supports directory name, DNS name, email and URI types ๐ฎ.X509_V_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_CONSTRAINT_SYNTAX: unsupported or invalid name constraint syntax โ the format of the name constraint is not recognised: for example an email address format of a form not mentioned in RFC 3280. This could be caused by a garbage extension or some new feature not currently supported ๐๏ธ.X509_V_ERR_CRL_PATH_VALIDATION_ERROR: CRL path validation error โ an error occurred when attempting to verify the CRL path. This error can only happen if extended CRL checking is enabled.X509_V_ERR_APPLICATION_VERIFICATION: application verification failure โ an application specific error. This will never be returned unless explicitly set by an application ๐โโ๏ธ.
๐ SEE ALSO ๐
go read these next, they're all linked and all worth it bestie ๐ซถ:
X509_STORE_CTX_new(3)X509_STORE_CTX_set_verify(3)X509_STORE_CTX_set_verify_cb(3)X509_STORE_set_verify_cb(3)X509_up_ref(3)X509_verify_cert(3)
๐ HISTORY ๐
okay so storytime, bestie, because the lore here is actually kind of iconic ๐ซถ โ everything on this page has a whole origin story, and the way these functions got drip-fed into existence over literal decades is giving slow-burn character arc โจ
- So the OG squad โ
X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(),X509_STORE_CTX_set_error(),X509_STORE_CTX_get_error_depth(),X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert(),X509_STORE_CTX_get_chain(), andX509_verify_cert_error_string()โ first appeared inSSLeay 0.8.0and have been available sinceOpenBSD 2.4. like. they are the elders of this friend group ๐ - Then
X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain()showed up later, first appearing inOpenSSL 0.9.5, and it's been available sinceOpenBSD 2.7. cute little glow-up era ๐ X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_issuer(),X509_STORE_CTX_get0_current_crl(), andX509_STORE_CTX_get0_parent_ctx()are theOpenSSL 1.0.0girlies โ first appeared there, available sinceOpenBSD 4.9. slay ๐ธX509_STORE_CTX_get0_chain()popped off inOpenSSL 1.1.0and has been available sinceOpenBSD 6.3. a whole new generation fr fr ๐ฆ- And the newest arrivals on the block:
X509_STORE_CTX_set_error_depth(),X509_STORE_CTX_set_current_cert(),X509_STORE_CTX_get_num_untrusted(), andX509_STORE_CTX_set0_verified_chain()โ also first appeared inOpenSSL 1.1.0, and they've been available sinceOpenBSD 7.1. main character energy, honestly ๐ญ๐ฅ
ngl the fact that this whole saga spans fromSSLeay 0.8.0all the way toOpenBSD 7.1is lowkey mind-blowing โ that's so many eras of Unix history and every single one of these functions survived the vibe check ๐๐
okay that's the whole page, bestie โ you made it to the end, proud of you fr fr ๐ this little slice of documentation is from the Debian build, dated June 6, 2023, and it answers to the name X509_STORE_CTX_GET_ERROR(3). go forth and slay your cert chain validation โจ๐
๐ฆ where this page comes from
- opensuse-leap 16.0: libressl-devel-doc 4.1.0-bp160.1.1 ยท OpenSSL
- Copyright (c) 2021 Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@openbsd.org>
- Copyright (c) 2009, 2016 The OpenSSL Project. All rights reserved
- ๐ girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms