RPM::G...sCheck(3pm)

📦
version 0.34 · 2 versions
, in fedora 43

okay so bestie, you clicked on a manual page called RPM::G...sCheck(3pm) and I need you to know right now that this is User Contributed Perl Documentation, which is the Perl equivalent of a group project where everyone showed up but nobody did the work. 💀 Buckle in, because this whole page is a template that never got filled in, and honestly? The unfilled-in-ness is the content. Let's go. ✨

💖 NAME 💖

FIXME — FIXME

Yeah. That's it. That's the name section. The name of the thing is literally the word FIXME. Iconic in a "we'll do it later" way. 🙈

🦋 SYNOPSIS 🦋

    use Fixme::FIXME;

    ....

the way that there's a use line for a module called Fixme::FIXME and then four dots as the rest of the synopsis… main character energy of "trust me bro". 💅

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

FIXME fixme fixme fixme

that's the description. three lowercase fixmes and a capital one. no cap, that is genuinely all it says. 🎀

🧚 CONSTRUCTOR 🧚

FIXME-only if OO

  • new( FIXME-args ) — FIXME FIXME describe constructor

so if you're doing the whole object-oriented thing (iykyk), this is where the constructor lives. The args are… FIXME-args. The description of what it does is… "FIXME FIXME describe constructor". The vibes are immaculate, the documentation is not. 😭

👑 METHODS 👑

FIXME document methods

  • method1 — ...
  • method2 — ...

two methods. Both of them are three dots. This is the documentation equivalent of sending a text that just says "k". 💜

⭐ EXPORTED FUNCTIONS ⭐

Nothing here, bestie. Empty. A whole section with no content, which is honestly a mood. 🫶

🌈 EXPORTED CONSTANTS 🌈

Also empty. Also a mood. We love a consistent aesthetic. ✨

🍓 EXPORTABLE FUNCTIONS 🍓

And this one's empty too! Three empty sections in a row. It's giving "minimalist". It's giving "we ran out of time". Lowkey both. 🎀

🔥 FILES 🔥

Yeah, this one has nothing in it either. A section called FILES with zero files. The audacity. 💅

💀 DIAGNOSTICS 💀

okay this is the part where there's ACTUAL INFORMATION, and it's all about antivirus scanners being like "girl what is this". Let's go one by one.

ClamAV

The ClamAV <http://www.clamav.net/> antivirus tool has found something suspicious in your package. This is so unlikely, so rare, so exceptional, that it's gotta be worth looking into.

A warning from this test needs investigating. First, because there are customers who run automated virus scans on incoming software and might not appreciate having to investigate a trigger coming from Red Hat software. Second, and much less likely (but not impossible) because it might be a real problem.

so like — this is SO rare that if it fires, you should absolutely sit up straight. Two reasons, fr fr: one, customers running auto virus scans on incoming software will Not Be Happy to find a trigger coming from Red Hat software; two, and way less likely but not impossible, it might actually be a real problem. 👀

ClamAVinternalerror

FIXME- this cannot happen.

the way this says it cannot happen and then also says FIXME. bestie which is it. 😭

BitDefender

The BitDefender antivirus tool <http://www.bitdefender.com/> has claimed to have found a problem. As of 2012-10-23 this is EXPERIMENTAL.

A warning from this test needs investigating. First, because there are customers who run automated virus scans on incoming software and might not appreciate having to investigate a trigger coming from Red Hat software. Second, and much less likely (but not impossible) because it might be a real problem.

so BitDefender is out here claiming it found a problem. As of 2012-10-23 this whole thing is EXPERIMENTAL, capital letters, no chill. Same two reasons as before: customers + auto scans = unhappy, and the tiny tiny chance it's real. 💜

BdScanFailed

The BitDefender antivirus tool <http://www.bitdefender.com/> failed to run. As of December 2012 this is because we don't have a license. Ignore this.

oh it just failed to run? as of December 2012 it's because there's no license. So. Ignore this one. Straight up "ignore this". Love that for us. 🙈

BdScanMissingResults

The BitDefender antivirus tool <http://www.bitdefender.com/> claims to have run successfully, but produced no output. This is unexpected. It should not happen.

it says it ran fine but gave you nothing back. That's unexpected. It should not happen. So if it happens… good luck, bestie. 🫶

AvScan

FIXME: the AvScan test is not in production.

AvScanFailed

FIXME: the AvScan test is not in production.

AvScanMissingResults

FIXME: the AvScan test is not in production.

all three AvScan entries say the exact same thing: the AvScan test is not in production. Copy-paste queen behavior, honestly. 👑

🎀 SEE ALSO 🎀

L<>

an empty POD link. It links to nothing. It's a link to the void. The void said hi back. 🌸

💅 AUTHOR 💅

Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>

shoutout Ed, carrying this entire page on his back. 🫶

😭 POD ERRORS 😭

Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained below:

  • Around line 478:
    • An empty L<>

so the doc itself is snitching on itself. Around line 478, there's an empty L<>. Which, yeah. We saw it. In SEE ALSO. It's still empty. Not me being emotionally attached to a broken link. 💀

and that's the whole page, bestie! 💖 Written by Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>, and this little beauty came to you courtesy of perl v5.42.0, dated 2025-07-25. Go fill in a FIXME, you're the main character now. periodt. ✨🦋🎀

📦 where this page comes from