RPM::G...ltilib(3pm)

πŸ“¦
version 0.34 Β· 2 versions
, in fedora 43

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

FIXME β€” FIXME

ok bestie, real talk: this page is a placeholder. The name literally says FIXME twice. That's not me being shady, that's just what it says. It's a stub that was never filled in, and honestly? Iconic in a cursed way. 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

use Fixme::FIXME;

....

That's it. That's the whole synopsis. The .... is doing so much heavy lifting here and telling us so little. πŸ’€


πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

FIXME fixme fixme fixme

Yeah so the description is also a placeholder. Four words, one of which is repeated three times. Not me reading this and learning absolutely nothing about what the module does. 😭


πŸŽ€ CONSTRUCTOR πŸŽ€

FIXME-only if OO

ngl this bit only matters if the module is object-oriented, and the original page is just vibing about it with another FIXME.

new( FIXME-args )

FIXME FIXME describe constructor

Two FIXMEs in one line. Double the mystery, double the chaos. ✨


πŸ’… METHODS πŸ’…

FIXME document methods

So... the methods are not documented. At all. The page just tells you, in FIXME form, that you should document them. πŸ’€

method1

...

method2

...

Both methods are just three dots. That's the whole lore. πŸ‘‘


🌸 EXPORTED FUNCTIONS 🌸

(nothing here β€” the section exists and is empty, and we respect that)


🌈 EXPORTED CONSTANTS 🌈

(also empty. also respected. periodt.)


🧚 EXPORTABLE FUNCTIONS 🧚

(still empty. the void is consistent.)


πŸ“ FILES πŸ“

(empty too β€” no files listed, so no files to hype up)


⭐ DIAGNOSTICS ⭐

Here's where the actual content lives, bestie. Pay attention, this part is real. πŸ‘€

MultilibMismatch

The 64- and 32-bit versions of FILE differ. This means that yum/rpm will refuse to install both versions at once.

🚨 Please don't blame rpmgrill for this: we're just reporting a potential problem. If this package will never ever ever be installed multilib, you can ignore this warning.

The "never ever ever" is doing exactly what it needs to do. If it's never ever ever multilib, you're fine. If it is, you're not. πŸ’…

DepGenDisabled

Build has multilib errors which may be caused by having turned off RPM's internal dependency generator.

This is horrendously complicated, but try starting here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Usage

Like, they literally said "horrendously complicated" in the manpage. That's the authors being honest with you and I respect it so much. 🫑


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

L<>

An empty link. That's it. The SEE ALSO section is pointing at nothing. The link has no target, no text, no destination. It's giving liminal space. 😭


πŸ‘‘ AUTHOR πŸ‘‘

Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>

Shoutout Ed. πŸ’œ


πŸ’€ POD ERRORS πŸ’€

Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained below:

Around line 249:

An empty L<>

Yeah, that empty link in SEE ALSO? Perl's POD parser caught it and called it out. So the page is broken and it knows it's broken. Self-aware king behavior honestly. 🌈


so that's the whole page bestie β€” a placeholder module page with real diagnostics and a broken link. It came from the User Contributed Perl Documentation collection, it's running on perl v5.42.0, and it's dated 2025-07-25. stay hydrated, read your diagnostics, and never ever ever install multilib by accident. mwah πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from