RPM::G...nifest(3pm)

💖 NAME 💖

RPM::G...nifest — and the description? It's FIXME. That's it. That's the whole vibe bestie, the name is FIXME and the one-liner is also FIXME. Placeholder era fr fr 🫶

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

Okay so this is literally what it says, no notes:

use Fixme::FIXME;

....

That .... is doing a lot of heavy lifting and honestly? Same.

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

FIXME fixme fixme fixme. The description section is fully in its FIXME era — no cap, it says FIXME fixme fixme fixme and then it's done. We move 💅

🎀 CONSTRUCTOR 🎀

The original note here is FIXME-only if OO — so this bit only exists if it's object-oriented, iykyk.

• new( FIXME-args ) — FIXME FIXME describe constructor. Yeah. The constructor description is, at time of writing, also a FIXME. It's giving "we'll fill this in later" and later never came 😭

🦋 METHODS 🦋

FIXME document methods — the methods section is currently a promise, not a delivery.

• method1 — ...
• method2 — ...

Those ellipses are load-bearing. They are the entire content. Slay? I guess? 🔥

🌈 EXPORTED FUNCTIONS 🌈

Nothing here. The heading exists, the content does not. Iconic minimalism.

⭐ EXPORTED CONSTANTS ⭐

Also empty. Just a heading floating there with main character energy and zero supporting cast.

🧚 EXPORTABLE FUNCTIONS 🧚

Empty too. Three headings in a row, all empty, all unbothered 👑

🍓 FILES 🍓

Empty as well. No files listed. None. Not a one.

---

💀 DIAGNOSTICS 💀

Okay NOW we're talking, this is the real content, the rest of this page was just the appetizer. These are the complaints this thing can throw at you:

• UnownedDirectory — Your package claims ownership of the parent directory, and at least one subdirectory inside the complained-about directory, but not the complained-about directory itself. You probably need to fix this using the rpm %dir directive in your specfile.

See <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories>

• NonFHS — Your package ships a file or directory underneath a protected part of the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (e.g. "/usr/local"). See <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/>.
• NonSystemdFile — As of Fedora 17, "/etc/init.d" is obsolete. All packages should be using systemd. See <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd>
• MoveToUsr — Fedora 17 and RHEL7 are doing away with "/bin", "/sbin", and "/lib*". Your package has one or more files that are still living there. These should be moved to the corresponding place under "/usr". See freedesktop.org <http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge>.
• BinfileBadOwner — Non-setuid files under "/bin", "/usr/bin", "/sbin", or "/usr/sbin"; and ELF DSOs; must be owned by user root.
• BinfileBadGroup — Non-setgid files under "/bin", "/usr/bin", "/sbin", or "/usr/sbin"; and ELF DSOs; must be owned by group root.

Lowkey the most useful part of the whole page and it's buried down here. Classic.

💜 SEE ALSO 💜

L<> — that's an empty link, bestie. There is nothing inside it. It links to the void. The void links back 🌌

👑 AUTHOR 👑

Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>

🙈 POD ERRORS 🙈

Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained below:

Around line 379:

• An empty L<>

Yeah, it clocked the empty link too. The parser is a hater and honestly? Correct 💅

---

And that's the whole page, babe! Brought to you by perl v5.42.0, dated 2025-07-25, filed under RPM::G...nifest(3pm) in the User Contributed Perl Documentation collection. Go read the FIXMEs again, they're not gonna fill themselves in 🫶✨