MKDoc:...Builder(3pm)

πŸ“¦
version 0.75 Β· 3 versions
, in ubuntu noble, ubuntu resolute, ubuntu stonking

πŸ¦‹ NAME πŸ¦‹

MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder β€” builds a parsed tree from XML data. That's it, that's the whole gig. ✨

(And yes bestie, you did just open the MKDoc:...Builder(3pm) page from the User Contributed Perl Documentation. Welcome to the function, we're vibing. πŸ’–)


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

my @top_nodes = MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder->process_data ($some_xml);

πŸ’… SUMMARY πŸ’…

Okay so MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder teams up with MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer to turn XML data into a parsed tree. Basically it smells like an XML parser, looks like an XML parser, and awfully overlaps with XML parsers. 😭

But it's not an XML parser. Read that again.

Here's the difference and it's giving very much main character:

  • XML parsers are required to die if the XML data is not well formed. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder doesn't give a rip: it'll parse whatever as long as it's good enough for it to parse. πŸ”₯
  • XML parsers expand entities. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder doesn't. At least not yet. πŸ™ˆ
  • XML parsers generally support namespaces. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder doesn't β€” and probably won't. πŸ’€

🚨 DISCLAIMER 🚨

Okay real talk, no cap: this module does low level XML manipulation. It will somehow parse even broken XML and try to do something with it. So unless you know what you're doing, do not use it. I'm serious, bestie. 🫢


πŸ‘‘ API πŸ‘‘

my @top_nodes = MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer->process_data ($some_xml);

This one hands you back all the top nodes of the $some_xml parsed tree. 🌸

And yeah, the XML spec says there can be only one top element in an XML file, but you have to take two things into account, ok:

  1. Pseudo-elements such as XML declarations, processing instructions, and comments. πŸ’…
  2. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder is not an XML parser, it's not its job to care about the XML specification, so having multiple top elements is just fine. periodt.

my $tokens = MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer->process_data ('/some/file.xml');

Same as MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder->process_data ($some_xml), except that it reads $some_xml from '/some/file.xml'. πŸ¦‹

🌈 Returned parsed tree - data structure 🌈

I have tried to make MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder look enormously like HTML::TreeBuilder. So most of this section is stolen and slightly adapted from the HTML::Element man page. (Not me telling on myself like this 😭)

START PLAGIARISM HERE

It may occur to you to wonder what exactly a "tree" is, and how it's represented in memory. Consider this HTML document:

<html lang='en-US'>
  <head>
    <title>Stuff</title>
    <meta name='author' content='Jojo' />
  </head>
  <body>
   <h1>I like potatoes!</h1>
  </body>
</html>

Build a syntax tree out of that and boom, you get a tree-structure in memory that could be diagrammed as:

                    html (lang='en-US')
                     / \
                   /     \
                 /         \
               head        body
              /\               \
            /    \               \
          /        \               \
        title     meta              h1
         |       (name='author',     |
      "Stuff"    content='Jojo')    "I like potatoes"

This is the traditional way to diagram a tree, with the "root" at the top, and it's this kind of diagram that people have in mind when they say, for example, that "the meta element is under the head element instead of under the body element". (The same is also said with "inside" instead of "under" β€” the use of "inside" makes more sense when you're looking at the HTML source.) iykyk.

Another way to represent the above tree is with indenting:

html (attributes: lang='en-US')
  head
    title
      "Stuff"
    meta (attributes: name='author' content='Jojo')
  body
    h1
      "I like potatoes"

Incidentally, diagramming with indenting works much better for very large trees, and is easier for a program to generate. The $tree->dump method uses indentation just that way. obsessed.

However you diagram the tree, it's stored the same in memory β€” it's a network of objects, each of which has attributes like so:

element #1:  _tag: 'html'
             _parent: none
             _content: [element #2, element #5]
             lang: 'en-US'

element #2:  _tag: 'head'
             _parent: element #1
             _content: [element #3, element #4]

element #3:  _tag: 'title'
             _parent: element #2
             _content: [text segment "Stuff"]

element #4   _tag: 'meta'
             _parent: element #2
             _content: none
             name: author
             content: Jojo

element #5   _tag: 'body'
             _parent: element #1
             _content: [element #6]

element #6   _tag: 'h1'
             _parent: element #5
             _content: [text segment "I like potatoes"]

The "treeness" of the tree-structure that these elements comprise is not an aspect of any particular object, but is emergent from the relatedness attributes (_parent and _content) of these element-objects and from how you use them to get from element to element. 🧚

STOP PLAGIARISM HERE

This is pretty much the kind of data structure MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder returns. More information on different nodes and their type is available in MKDoc::XML::Token. ⭐


πŸ’œ NOTES πŸ’œ

Did I mention that MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder is NOT an XML parser? πŸ™ˆ


πŸŽ€ AUTHOR πŸŽ€

Copyright 2003 - MKDoc Holdings Ltd.

Author: Jean-Michel Hiver

This module is free software and is distributed under the same license as Perl itself. Use it at your own risk. πŸ’…


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

  • MKDoc::XML::Token
  • MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer

and that's the whole page bestie, slay πŸ’– this one came to you courtesy of perl v5.36.0, dated 2022-10-13, and it was literally iconic of you to read all the way to the bottom. go build a tree. πŸŒΈπŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from