DBIx::...umnName(3pm)

💖 NAME 💖

DBIx::Class::Helper::Schema::Verifier::RelationshipColumnName — the lil guardian angel that makes sure your relationships and your column names are not twinning. ✨

---

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

package MyApp::Schema;

__PACKAGE__->load_components('Helper::Schema::Verifier::RelationshipColumnName');

that's it bestie, one line of load_components and you're protected 🫶

---

🦋 DESCRIPTION 🦋

okay so DBIx::Class::Helper::Schema::Verifier::RelationshipColumnName</p> is out here doing a vibe check on your schema: it verifies that none of your columns have the same name as a relationship. periodt.

why do we care?? because if you create a relationship that has the same name as a column, then to actually get at that column you're gonna be forced to use get_column. 😭 and honestly? it's just confusing having them be the same name. it's giving chaos. it's giving "which one did i mean".

what i (the author) tend to do is define the columns to be something like user_id and have the relationship then be simply user. clean, distinct, iconic. 👑

so like — columns over here, relationships over there, no overlap, no drama. 💅

---

💜 AUTHOR 💜

Arthur Axel "fREW" Schmidt <frioux+cpan@gmail.com>

---

🎀 COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE 🎀

This software is copyright (c) 2024 by Arthur Axel "fREW" Schmidt.

This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself.

---

and that's the whole page bestie!! ✨ this one shipped as part of the User Contributed Perl Documentation, running on perl v5.40.0, dated 2024-11-16 — so go forth, keep your column names and your relationship names distinct, and slay 💖🦋🌸