PTHREAD_RWLOCK_DESTROY(3P)

πŸ’… PTHREAD_RWLOCK_DESTROY β€” POSIX Programmer's Manual (3P) πŸŽ€

okay bestie, before we even get into it: this page lives in the POSIX Programmer's Manual, and there's a whole PROLOG situation you need to know about πŸ‘€

🚨 PROLOG (read this first, fr) 🚨

This manual page is part of the POSIX Programmer's Manual. The Linux implementation of this interface may differ (consult the corresponding Linux manual page for details of Linux behavior), or the interface may not be implemented on Linux. (so like… vibe check your platform first, bestie πŸ’€)


✨ NAME ✨

pthread_rwlock_destroy, pthread_rwlock_init β€” destroy and initialize a read-write lock object


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

#include <pthread.h>

int pthread_rwlock_destroy(pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock);
int pthread_rwlock_init(pthread_rwlock_t *restrict rwlock,
    const pthread_rwlockattr_t *restrict attr);
pthread_rwlock_t rwlock = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so pthread_rwlock_destroy() shall destroy the read-write lock object referenced by rwlock and release any resources used by the lock. the way that this is a one-way door tho 😭 The effect of subsequent use of the lock is undefined until the lock is reinitialized by another call to pthread_rwlock_init(). An implementation may cause pthread_rwlock_destroy() to set the object referenced by rwlock to an invalid value. Results are undefined if pthread_rwlock_destroy() is called when any thread holds rwlock. Attempting to destroy an uninitialized read-write lock results in undefined behavior. (not me destroying a lock someone's still holding… bestie no. absolutely not. jail.)

Meanwhile pthread_rwlock_init() shall allocate any resources required to use the read-write lock referenced by rwlock and initializes the lock to an unlocked state with attributes referenced by attr. If attr is NULL, the default read-write lock attributes shall be used; the effect is the same as passing the address of a default read-write lock attributes object. Once initialized, the lock can be used any number of times without being reinitialized. iconic, low-maintenance, no notes πŸ’… Results are undefined if pthread_rwlock_init() is called specifying an already initialized read-write lock. Results are undefined if a read-write lock is used without first being initialized. so… init before use. that's the whole vibe. periodt.

If the pthread_rwlock_init() function fails, rwlock shall not be initialized and the contents of rwlock are undefined.

See Section 2.9.9, Synchronization Object Copies and Alternative Mappings for further requirements.

In cases where default read-write lock attributes are appropriate, the macro PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER can be used to initialize read-write locks. The effect shall be equivalent to dynamic initialization by a call to pthread_rwlock_init() with the attr parameter specified as NULL, except that no error checks are performed. (static init girlies, this one's for you 🫢 just know the trade-off.)

The behavior is undefined if the value specified by the attr argument to pthread_rwlock_init() does not refer to an initialized read-write lock attributes object.


⭐ RETURN VALUE ⭐

If successful, the pthread_rwlock_destroy() and pthread_rwlock_init() functions shall return zero; otherwise, an error number shall be returned to indicate the error. zero = slay, nonzero = we have a situation ✨


πŸ”₯ ERRORS πŸ”₯

The pthread_rwlock_init() function shall fail if:

  • EAGAIN β€” The system lacked the necessary resources (other than memory) to initialize another read-write lock. (it's not the memory, bestie, it's everything else)
  • ENOMEM β€” Insufficient memory exists to initialize the read-write lock.
  • EPERM β€” The caller does not have the privilege to perform the operation. no permission, no party 🚫

These functions shall not return an error code of [EINTR].

The following sections are informative.


πŸ¦‹ EXAMPLES πŸ¦‹

None. (literally none. the examples section said "not today" πŸ’€)


🌈 APPLICATION USAGE 🌈

Applications using these and related read-write lock functions may be subject to priority inversion, as discussed in the Base Definitions volume of POSIX.1‐2017, Section 3.291, Priority Inversion. iykyk β€” go read that section if you're doing anything real-time-ish πŸ‘‘


🧚 RATIONALE 🧚

If an implementation detects that the value specified by the rwlock argument to pthread_rwlock_destroy() does not refer to an initialized read-write lock object, it is recommended that the function should fail and report an [EINVAL] error.

If an implementation detects that the value specified by the attr argument to pthread_rwlock_init() does not refer to an initialized read-write lock attributes object, it is recommended that the function should fail and report an [EINVAL] error.

If an implementation detects that the value specified by the rwlock argument to pthread_rwlock_destroy() or pthread_rwlock_init() refers to a locked read-write lock object, or detects that the value specified by the rwlock argument to pthread_rwlock_init() refers to an already initialized read-write lock object, it is recommended that the function should fail and report an [EBUSY] error. (busy lock = busy bestie, she said what she said πŸ’…)


πŸ’œ FUTURE DIRECTIONS πŸ’œ

None. (the future is… nothing. it's giving peace and quiet 🌸)


πŸŽ€ SEE ALSO πŸŽ€

  • pthread_rwlock_rdlock()
  • pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock()
  • pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock()
  • pthread_rwlock_trywrlock()
  • pthread_rwlock_unlock()

Also: the Base Definitions volume of POSIX.1‐2017, Section 3.291, Priority Inversion, <pthread.h>


Portions of this text are reprinted and reproduced in electronic form from IEEE Std 1003.1-2017, Standard for Information Technology -- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX), The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7, 2018 Edition, Copyright (C) 2018 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and The Open Group. In the event of any discrepancy between this version and the original IEEE and The Open Group Standard, the original IEEE and The Open Group Standard is the referee document. The original Standard can be obtained online at http://www.opengroup.org/unix/online.html .

Any typographical or formatting errors that appear in this page are most likely to have been introduced during the conversion of the source files to man page format. To report such errors, see https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html .


okay that's the whole page bestie, you ate, go init something responsibly πŸ’– This was brought to you by IEEE/The Open Group, 2017 β€” mwah, stan a standards body, no cap 🫢✨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from