STD::IS_NOTHROW_COPY_CONSTRUCTIBLE(3cxx)

🌸 std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible< _Tp > — a 3cxx manual page, bestie edition 🌸

okay so you found yourself a libstdc++ page, and it's a 3cxx one, which means it's a C++ header thing, not a "type this into your terminal and pray" thing. buckle up 🎀

---

✨ NAME ✨

std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible< _Tp > — literally the trait called is_nothrow_copy_constructible. that's the whole name. it's giving "what it says on the tin" 💅

---

🦋 SYNOPSIS 🦋

#include <type_traits>

Inherits __is_nothrow_constructible_impl< _Tp, __add_lval_ref_t< const _Tp > >.

no cap, that inheritance line is the whole personality. it's a type trait built on top of another type trait, which is built on top of... you get it, it's traits all the way down 🫶

---

🌈 Detailed Description 🌈

template<typename _Tp>
struct std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible< _Tp >

"is_nothrow_copy_constructible" — yes that quote mark situation is exactly how it shows up in the page, and yes it is a little unhinged of it 🙈

so here's the vibe check: it's a struct, it's templated on _Tp, and its entire job is answering the question "can you copy-construct a _Tp without it throwing?" — that's the question it exists to answer, and the name is just very online about it. main character energy for a compile-time bool, honestly 👑

---

👑 Author 👑

Generated automatically by Doxygen for libstdc++ from the source code. so nobody hand-wrote this one — Doxygen spat it out, libstdc++ provided the material, and we're all just living in its world 💖

---

⭐ a cute sign-off ⭐

and that's the page! source/version realness: this is a libstdc++ manpage, in the 3cxx manual, and the footer date did not survive the trip through the header mangling 😭 — the last line just reads libstdstd::is_nothro...ructible< _Tp >(3cxx) which is lowkey the most Gen Z footer ever, all truncated and dramatic 💀

go forth and static_assert responsibly, bestie 🌸✨🦋