STD::IS_NOTHROW_ASSIGNABLE(3cxx)

🌸 std::is_nothrow_assignable< _Tp, _Up > 🌸

okay bestie, welcome to the <type_traits> corner of the libstdc++ man pages (section 3cxx, yes ma'am 💅). This one's a header-only little icon and honestly it's giving "short but important".

---

✨ NAME ✨

std::is_nothrow_assignable< _Tp, _Up > — literally just is_nothrow_assignable. That's the whole name, no notes. 🎀

---

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

#include <type_traits>

That's it, that's the include. 🦋

And it inherits __is_nothrow_assignable_impl< _Tp, _Up >. Like, that's its whole personality — it's a subclass of the impl. slay.

---

💖 Detailed Description 💖

okay so here's the actual declaration, and you know we're keeping it character for character:

template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
    struct std::is_nothrow_assignable< _Tp, _Up >

and the compiler-generated blurb attached to it just says: "is_nothrow_assignable. Riveting. Iconic. No further comment from the documentation team. 🙈

Two template params, _Tp and _Up, both typename, both doing their little main-character thing. That's the entire struct. It inherits from __is_nothrow_assignable_impl< _Tp, _Up > (as mentioned up in the synopsis, so yes I'm repeating myself, that's called consistency bestie). ✨

---

👑 Author 👑

Generated automatically by Doxygen for libstdc++ from the source code.

so nobody actually wrote this with their hands, the robots did it, and honestly they ate. 🤖💅

---

🌈 Sign-off 🌈

okay that's the whole page, we love a short one. This little gem came to you from libstdc++, section 3cxx of the manual — and the footer was nice enough to repeat the title back at us one more time (the date part lowkey got eaten by the ... in the title, so like, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯, no cap). go forth and type-check some assignability, bestie. 🫶💜🌸