__GNU_PBDS::DETAIL::STORED_VALUE(3cxx)

🎀 NAME 🎀

__gnu_pbds::detail::stored_value< _Tv > — literally just "Stored value," bestie, that's the whole vibe 💅

(also, hi, this is a libstdc++ manual page, section 3cxx — we're in the deep internals now 👑)

---

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

Okay so first thing, you gotta pull in the header:

#include <types_traits.hpp>

And that's it, that's the whole entry point 🫶

🌸 Inherited by

This little struct is the parent of these two icons:

• __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_data< _Tv, _Th, Store_Hash >
• __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_data< _Tv, _Th, false >

Like, both of them. Same template, but one with Store_Hash and one hardcoded to false. The way that false is doing main character energy 😭

---

💖 Public Types 💖

• value_type — typedef'd to _Tv. No cap, it's just your template parameter wearing a cute little name tag 🏷️

---

🦋 Public Attributes 🦋

• m_value — of type value_type. That's it. That's the attribute. It holds the value. Iconic behaviour, truly 🌈

---

⭐ Detailed Description ⭐

So the actual declaration is:

template<typename _Tv>
    struct __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_value< _Tv >

And the docstring says, verbatim: "Stored value." 💀

Not me getting a whole manpage for a struct that stores a value. The naming department ATE and left no crumbs 🍓

Lowkey, this is one of those detail-namespace things — it's internal plumbing for __gnu_pbds, so don't go building your whole app on it, bestie 🙈

---

🌸 Author 🌸

Generated automatically by Doxygen for libstdc++ from the source code. So like, no human wrote this, a robot did, and honestly? She understood the assignment 🤖✨

---

okay that's the whole page, ily, go forth and store values responsibly 💜

— this has been __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_value< _Tv >, section 3cxx, straight outta libstdc++, generated by Doxygen 🎀