__GNU_PBDS::DETAIL::STORED_HASH(3cxx)

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

okay bestie, you're on the __gnu_pbds::det...red_hash< _Th >(3cxx) page β€” the libstdc++ manual vibe, no cap.

It's called Stored hash. That's the whole name. Iconic, lowkey.

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

First thing, the include:

#include <types_traits.hpp>

And this one is inherited by __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_data< _Tv, _Th, Store_Hash > β€” yes, exactly that, spaces and all.

πŸŽ€ Public Types πŸŽ€

  • typedef _Th hash_type β€” the public type, literally _Th under the nickname hash_type. Slay.

🌸 Public Attributes 🌸

  • hash_type m_hash β€” the public attribute, and its type is hash_type. Very self-consistent of it πŸ’….

πŸ¦‹ Detailed Description πŸ¦‹

Here's the template situation, bestie:

template<typename _Th>
    struct __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_hash< _Th >

And the description reads "Stored hash. β€” yep, that's the quote situation, we're preserving it exactly 😭.

So: template<typename _Th> + struct __gnu_pbds::detail::stored_hash< _Th > + β€œStored hash.” That's the whole detailed-description moment. Periodt.

πŸ‘‘ Author πŸ‘‘

Generated automatically by Doxygen for libstdc++ from the source code.

That's the author line, verbatim, and honestly Doxygen ate and left no crumbs ✨.


okay that's the page, bestie πŸ’– the footer vibe is libst__gnu_pbds::det...red_hash< _Th >(3cxx), it's for libstdc++, generated automatically by Doxygen from the source code, and no date is printed on this one β€” periodt 🫢