TT_MESSAGE_ABSTAINERS_COUNT(3)
okay bestie, welcome to the library call manual page for tt_message_abstainers_count β yes, that manual name is doing the absolute most, but we move π
πΈ NAME πΈ
tt_message_abstainers_count β return a count of the offerβs abstaining procids β¨
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
#include &<Tt/tt_c.h>
int tt_message_abstainers_count(
Tt_message m);
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
tt_message_abstainers_count returns a count of the procids that are recorded in the offer m as having abstained from it. No cap, thatβs the whole vibe π
The m argument is the opaque handle for the message involved in this operation. Iconic. π«Ά
π RETURN VALUE π
Upon successful completion, tt_message_abstainers_count returns a count of the procids that are recorded in the offer m as having abstained from it. The application can use tt_int_error to extract one of the following Tt_status values from the returned integer:
TT_OKβ the operation completed successfully. slay βTT_ERR_PROCIDβ there is no valid default procid, perhaps becausett_openhas not yet been called. πTT_ERR_STATEβ the specified message is not in stateTT_RETURNED. Since onlyTT_OFFERscan be in stateTT_RETURNED, this status will be returned if the specified message is aTT_NOTICEor aTT_REQUEST. πTT_ERR_POINTERβ the pointer passed does not point to an object of the correct type for this operation. bestie, wrong type π©
π SEE ALSO π
Tt/tt_c.h-Tttt_c(5),tt_message_abstainer(3),tt_int_error(3)π
signing off from the tt_message...iners_count(library call) corner of the universe: source/version is tt_message...iners_count(library call), and the date isnβt listed on the page, so Iβm not gonna invent one, bestie π«Άπ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixos 26.05: cde 2.5.3
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms