std::ranges...ntinel::base(3)

πŸ“¦ version 2024.07.05, in nixpkgs unstable, opensuse-leap 16.0

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

std::ranges::enumerate_view::sentinel::base β€” bestie, it's literally std::ranges::enumerate_view::sentinel::base. That's the whole name, no cap, it's a long one and we're not sorry about it. This page is from the C++ Standard Library manual, and it's about getting the underlying sentinel out of an enumerate_view's sentinel. Obsessed with a one-line function that does exactly one thing? Yes. πŸŽ€


✨ Synopsis ✨

constexpr ranges::sentinel_t<Base> base() const;  (since C++23)

So this lil member function has been living its best life since C++23, it's constexpr (of course she is πŸ’…), and she takes no arguments. Main character energy from a function with an empty parameter list.

🌸 Parameters 🌸

(none) β€” truly nothing. No args, no baggage, no drama. She needs zero input and she still delivers. 🫢

πŸ’– Return value πŸ’–

A copy of the underlying sentinel. That's it, that's the whole vibe. She's equivalent to return end_; β€” like, literally:

return end_;

No cap, that's the entire implementation. It's giving "my job here is done" and honestly? Slay. πŸ”₯

πŸ¦‹ Example πŸ¦‹

This section is incomplete β€” Reason: no example. 😭

Yep, there is no example here yet. Not me showing up to the demo with nothing in my hands. If you were hoping for a cute little snippet to copy, bestie, the well is dry, the example is a todo. πŸ™ˆ

πŸ‘‘ Category πŸ‘‘

  • Todo no example

That's the category. To-do: no example. Same energy as that empty Example section above β€” they're matching, it's iconic in a tragic way. πŸ’€


k byeeee β€” this page came from http://cppreference.com, version 2024.06.10, dated 2024.06.10, and that's the whole manual page. Go get that underlying sentinel copy, queen. β­πŸ“πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from