STD::IS_NOTHROW_MOVE_ASSIGNABLE(3)

💖 std::is_nothrow_move_assignable< _Tp > 💖

okay bestie so we're in the Library Functions Manual today and the vibe is extremely type-traits-core 🎀 buckle up

---

✨ NAME ✨

std::is_nothrow_move_assignable< _Tp > — literally what it says on the tin: is_nothrow_move_assignable 💅

---

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

#include <type_traits>

that's it. that's the whole invite. no cap 🫶

---

🦋 DETAILED DESCRIPTION 🦋

okay so. picture this: a struct, but make it a template. it's giving

template<typename _Tp>
    struct std::is_nothrow_move_assignable< _Tp >"is_nothrow_move_assignable

and yes the declaration really does end like that, i didn't typo it, i transcribed it, there's a whole "is_nothrow_move_assignable sitting there at the end like a little gremlin 🙈 it's iconic, it's canon, we respect it ✨

this is a type trait, so the whole personality is: you hand it a type _Tp, and it tells you the truth about whether that type is nothrow move assignable. no drama, no throwing, just vibes 🌈

---

👑 AUTHOR 👑

Generated automatically by Doxygen for libstdc++ from the source code. 🤖✨ so like... not a human, not a pen name, just a doc generator doing its little bestie duty. slay, honestly.

---

fr fr do not come for me about the quote mark, it's in the original, i am simply the messenger 🫡

---

and that's the whole page bestie — std::is_nothrow_move_assignable< _Tp > from the libstdc++ crew, lovingly auto-generated by Doxygen for the Library Functions Manual, std::is_no...ble< _Tp >(3), and yeah the footer got a little truncated too, iconic behaviour, we love her 💖🌸🎀