STD::IS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTIBLE(3)

✨ std::is_nothrow_constructible ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to section 3 of the libstdc++ manual 💖 this page is all about std::is_nothrow_constructible< _Tp, _Args > and ngl it is short. like, blink-and-you-miss-it short. but we're gonna read it together anyway because that's what besties do 🫶

---

💅 NAME 💅

std::is_nothrow_constructible< _Tp, _Args > — and the description is… is_nothrow_constructible. that's the whole thing. it's giving "the name is the name". iconic, honestly 👑

---

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

you gotta pull in the traits header first, no cap:

#include <type_traits>

---

🦋 DETAILED DESCRIPTION 🦋

here's the actual declaration, copy-pasted with love and zero edits, because the rule is the facts stay facts:

template<typename _Tp, typename... _Args>
struct std::is_nothrow_constructible< _Tp, _Args >"is_nothrow_constructible

so yeah, that's a template taking typename _Tp and typename... _Args, and it's a struct named std::is_nothrow_constructible< _Tp, _Args >. that stray "is_nothrow_constructible hanging off the end? that's just how the page came out, bestie — we do not touch, we do not fix, we report. it's part of the lore 🧚

lowkey this section is the entire documentation. Doxygen said "here's the signature, good luck, bye" 😭

---

💜 AUTHOR 💜

Generated automatically by Doxygen for libstdc++ from the source code. no human author, just a robot doing its lil thing ✨

---

and that's the whole page! it came from libstdc++, section 3 of the manual, and the footer just says libstdc++ with the page name — no date, no version drama, just vibes 🌈 stay constructible, stay nothrow, and remember: when in doubt, check <type_traits> 💖💅🎀