lsm_string_list_alloc(3)

πŸ“¦
version 1.10.3 Β· 3 versions
, in fedora 43, fedora 44

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

lsm_string_list_alloc β€” bestie, this is the one that allocates the memory for a string list ✨


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

lsm_string_list * lsm_string_list_alloc (uint32_t size);

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • size β€” a uint32_t, aka the count of string. Yes, "string" singular, that's how the page says it and I'm not fighting it πŸ’…

⭐ VERSION ⭐

1.0 β€” the vibe check passed, it's version one point oh πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

Okay so like, this function allocates the memory for a string list. That's the whole job, and she does it well 🫢

And here's the cute part β€” every single element gets set to NULL. All of them. Not some, not most. All. It's giving fresh-start energy, no cap πŸ’–


🌈 RETURN 🌈

  • It hands you back a pointer of lsm_string ✨
  • It gives you NULL if the memory allocation fails β€” or if size is 0 πŸ’€ (yeah, zero gets you nothing, literally)
  • Whatever you get back, you should free it with lsm_string_list_free. That's not optional bestie, that's a moral obligation πŸ™ˆ
fr fr, if you skip the lsm_string_list_free step, that memory is just out there living its main character life with no way home. Don't do that to her 😭

okay that's the whole page, thanks for coming to my TED talk πŸ’œ This was pulled from the Libstoragemgmt C API Manual, dated February 2026, and the page itself is lsm_string_list_alloc β€” which, fun fact, is also the name of the function, the name of the page, and honestly at this point it's the name of the whole moment 🌟 Mwah, go free your lists πŸ’…πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from