ldns(3)
π ldns(3) β bestie edition π
okay so this is a page from the ldns library manual, section 3 (that's the "library functions" girlies, not the command-line ones, iykyk). it's a whole manual for one tiny function and honestly? we love a dedicated queen. π
β¨ NAME β¨
ldns_is_rrset β the girl who tells you whether an rr_list is actually an rrset π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <ldns/ldns.h>
bool ldns_is_rrset(const ldns_rr_list *rr_list);
like. look at her. one parameter, one bool, zero drama. main character energy fr fr. β¨
πΈ DESCRIPTION πΈ
okay so ldns_is_rrset() does exactly one thing and does it flawlessly: it checks if an rr_list is a rrset. that's it. that's the whole job. and she ate. π
rr_listβ therr_listyou want checked, bestie. hand it over. π«Ά- Returns β
trueif it is an rrset, otherwisefalse. no in-between, no "it's complicated", just a clean little boolean. periodt.
π AUTHOR π
The ldns team at NLnet Labs. iconic. no notes. π
π REPORTING BUGS π
found a bug? don't be shy, don't suffer in silence, do NOT just close the tab and pretend you didn't see it π β tell the team:
- email:
dns-team@nlnetlabs.nl - or on GitHub at
https://github.com/NLnetLabs/ldns/issues
they literally want to hear from you. it's giving community. it's giving open source. π
π COPYRIGHT π
Copyright (c) 2004 - 2006 NLnet Labs.
Licensed under the BSD License. and listen β there is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. like, zero. none. nope. π
fr fr, if it breaks, that's on you bestie. the license said so. read it. respect it. π
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
ldns_rrldns_rr_list
And perldoc Net::DNS, RFC1034, RFC1035, RFC4033, RFC4034 and RFC4035. yes that's a lot of RFCs, no you don't have to read them all tonight, but they're there when you're ready. β
π§ REMARKS π§
just so you know: this manpage was automatically generated from the ldns source code. so if the vibes feel a little machine-made, that's why. still slaps though. π
and that's the whole page, bestie!! stay hydrated, read your RFCs, and remember: 30 May 2006, ldns(3) β that's the date and the section, and yes she's been iconic since 2006. πβ¨ππ¦πΈπ
π¦ where this page comes from
- alpine 3.22: ldns-doc 1.8.4-r0 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- alpine 3.23: ldns-doc 1.8.4-r1 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- alpine 3.24: ldns-doc 1.8.4-r1 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- arch rolling: ldns 1.9.2-1 Β· custom:BSD
- debian trixie: libldns-dev 1.8.4-2+b1
- fedora 43: ldns-devel 1.8.4-8.fc43 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 43: ldns-devel 1.8.4-8.fc43 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 43: ldns-devel 1.9.2-1.fc43 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 43: ldns-devel 1.9.2-1.fc43 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 44: ldns-devel 1.9.0-2.fc44 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 44: ldns-devel 1.9.0-2.fc44 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 44: ldns-devel 1.9.2-1.fc44 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- fedora 44: ldns-devel 1.9.2-1.fc44 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- nixos 26.05: ldns 1.9.2
- nixpkgs unstable: ldns 1.9.2
- opensuse-leap 16.0: ldns-devel 1.8.4-160000.3.1 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- opensuse-leap 16.0: ldns-devel 1.8.4-160000.3.1 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- opensuse-leap 16.0: ldns-devel 1.8.4-160000.3.1 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- opensuse-leap 16.0: ldns-devel 1.8.4-160000.3.1 Β· BSD-3-Clause
- ubuntu questing: libldns-dev 1.8.4-2build1
- ubuntu resolute: libldns-dev 1.8.4-2build3
- ubuntu stonking: libldns-dev 1.9.2-1ubuntu1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms