libnvmf_tid_parse_strict(9)

πŸ“¦ version 3.2, in arch rolling

πŸ’– libnvmf_tid_parse_strict(9) β€” the strict bestie of libnvmf_tid_parse() πŸ’–

okay so this is a page from the libnvme API manual, and honestly? it's giving "picky friend who checks your outfit before you leave the house" energy. let's get into it πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int libnvmf_tid_parse_strict (struct libnvme_global_ctx *ctx , const
       char *str , struct libnvme_tid **out );

like yeah it's a mouthful but she's literally just libnvmf_tid_parse() with ✨standards✨


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • ctx β€” the global context, she's here for the logging vibes only πŸ’…
  • str β€” the input string, aka the thing we're parsing, the moment of truth πŸ¦‹
  • out β€” on success this gets the allocated TID; on error it's NULL. no TID for you πŸ™ˆ

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so basically: same as libnvmf_tid_parse β€” literally the same function, same energy β€” except the strict version is not letting anything slide. like, not one thing. 🚨

the three things that get you sent home in this version (any one of them fails the whole parse instead of being skipped):

  • a malformed token β€” that's a non-empty bare token with no '=' in it 😭
  • an empty value πŸ’€
  • an unrecognized key β€” she does not know her, she does not claim her πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

meanwhile, empty tokens are still totally benign, bestie β€” those come from ";;" or from a trailing ';', and they can stay, they're harmless, they're literally just vibing 🌈

and why would you want this strictness? because sometimes an unrecognized key should be treated as an error β€” think a typo in a hand-edited config 🫠 β€” instead of being silently ignored like it's no big deal. strict mode said "not on my watch." periodt. πŸ’…βœ¨


πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • 0 β€” slay, success ✨ (*out is the allocated TID, iconic)
  • -EINVAL β€” if ctx, out or str is NULL, or if there's a malformed token. rude but fair πŸ’€
  • -ENOMEM β€” allocation said "no ❀️", i.e. allocation failure 😭

ngl, if you're hand-editing a config and you keep getting -EINVAL, that's not the kernel being mean, that's a typo you haven't found yet. she's helping 🫢

that's the whole page, mwah πŸ’‹ β€” this was the libnvme API manual, entry libnvmf_tid_parse_strict(9), dated October 2026. go forth and parse strictly, bestie πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from