LIBNVMF_REGISTRY_DEVICE_FOR_EACH-LIBNVME3(2)
β¨ NAME β¨
libnvmf_registry_device_for_each β bestie, this is the one that iterates over live controller registry entries π
like it literally walks the registry and hands you every entry that's still alive and thriving.
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
int libnvmf_registry_device_for_each (struct libnvme_global_ctx *ctx ,
int (*callback)(const char *device, void *user_data) , void *user_data
);
okay so that's the whole vibe right there β one call, one callback, zero drama (mostly) π«Ά
π ARGUMENTS π
ctxβ your libnvme global context β¨ heads up though: this one must not be NULL, like fr fr, don't even try it πcallbackβ the callback that gets invoked for each live entry π every single one, bestieuser_dataβ your own lil payload, passed straight through tocallbackπ it's yours, do what you want with it
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
So what actually happens? It scans the registry directory and invokes callback for each entry whose corresponding /dev/nvmeN device node exists π
Stale entries left behind after a controller is removed? Silently skipped. Not a word. Not a peep. They just get ghosted πβ¨
β οΈ Now here's the important bit, bestie, don't scroll past this: the existence check is advisory. A device may be removed between the check and the callback invocation β like the check says "she's here!" and then she's literally gone π so callers should handle ENOENT gracefully. No cap, this is a real one.
π₯ RETURN π₯
0on success β slay π- negative errno if the registry directory cannot be opened π
0when the directory does not exist β which just means nothing is registered, so like, nothing to see here, everything's fine π
and that's the whole page, bestie, you ate it up π
πΈ mwah π this gem came to you from the libnvme API manual, section 9, dated October 2026 β iconic, periodt π
π¦ where this page comes from
- arch rolling: nvme-cli 3.2-1 Β· GPL-2.0-or-later
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms