libnvmf_exclusion_add(9)

💖 libnvmf_exclusion_add — the manual page, but make it cute ✨

okay so bestie, this is a page from the libnvme API manual, section 9. Sit down, hydrate, and let's get into it because this little function is lowkey iconic 🫶

---

✨ NAME ✨

libnvmf_exclusion_add — append an entry to a named list (atomic write). that's it, that's the whole vibe 💅

---

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int libnvmf_exclusion_add (struct libnvme_global_ctx *ctx , const char
*name , const char *entry );

like yes she takes three arguments and returns an int, we been knew 💖

---

🎀 ARGUMENTS 🎀

• ctx — the libnvme global context. and listen to me: it must not be NULL. no cap, not even a little. 🙈
• name — the list name. that's the name of the list. slay, that's it, that's the whole description 🌸
• entry — a semicolon-separated key=value string, fr fr. the example in the docs is literally "transport=tcp;traddr=192.168.1.1" so like, that's the energy ✨

---

🦋 DESCRIPTION 🦋

so what does she do? she appends an entry to a named list, and the write is atomic — main character behaviour honestly 👑

if the list doesn't already exist, she creates it. no big deal, she just makes it happen 🧚

and bestie, she's not naive: before writing anything, she validates the entry for unknown keys. if the entry is invalid, she returns -EINVAL. she said "not on my watch" 💀

it's giving careful, it's giving thorough, it's giving validated before write 🔥

---

💜 RETURN 💜

• 0 on success 🎉 slay
• a negative errno otherwise 😭

that's the whole return contract, no surprises, periodt.

---

💡 reminder bestie: ctx must not be NULL, and a bad entry gets you -EINVAL before anything is even written. protect your return values, protect your peace 🫶

---

okay so that's literally the whole page!! hope this helped you understand it as much as i do, mwah 💖✨🎀🦋🌸💅

sign-off time: this was libnvmf_exclusion_add from the libnvme API manual, dated October 2026 — that's libnvmf_exclusion_add(9) to you and me, iykyk 🍓🌈⭐👑