PP(1)
π¦ PP(1) π¦
okay bestie, this is PP(1) from User Contributed Perl Documentation β aka the page that teaches you how PDL::PP turns concise descriptions into PDL routines. Itβs giving βmeta but make it cuteβ π
β¨
πΈ NAME πΈ
PDL::PP β generate PDL routines from concise descriptions π«Ά
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
vibe check, bestie β hereβs the demo, exactly as written:
# let PDL::PP tell you what it's doing
$::PP_VERBOSE = 1;
pp_def(
'sumover',
Pars => 'a(n); [o]b();',
Code => q{
double tmp=0;
loop(n) %{
tmp += $a();
%}
$b() = tmp;
},
);
pp_done();
# do not call exit() as some processing can be done in same process
π FUNCTIONS π
okay so hereβs the quick-reference lineup of functions PDL::PP gives you β yes, all of them, no skipping π€β¨
π pp_add_boot
adds code to the BOOT section of the generated XS file π₯Ύ
π pp_add_exported
adds functions to the list of exported functions π¦
π pp_add_isa
adds entries to the @ISA list π³
π pp_addbegin
sets the code to be added at the top of the generate .pm file π«Ά
π pp_addhdr
adds code and includes to the C section of the generated XS file π§΅
when this is used in a module thatβs βmulti-Cβ (one .c file per pp_defed function), you gotta keep in mind that as each one is generated, all the pp_addhdr so far will be included. so if you add C functions, make sure to make them static to avoid clashes with later .c files. but a better practice is make them be separate C files, with any necessary .h to be included by them and the .pd file. you can then add them to your Makefile.PL (note this is the _int version, see separate notes on how to βopt-inβ for your own modules):
my @pack = (["pnm.pd", qw(Pnm PDL::IO::Pnm)]);
my %hash = pdlpp_stdargs_int(@pack);
$hash{OBJECT} .= ' get$(OBJ_EXT)';
sub MY::postamble { pdlpp_postamble_int(@pack); };
WriteMakefile(%hash);
π pp_addpm
adds code to the generated .pm file π
π pp_addxs
adds extra XS code to the generated XS file π§©
π pp_add_macros
adds extra $MACRO() definitions for these functions. note these generate C code. π₯
pp_add_macros(SUCC => sub { "($_[0] + 1)" });
# ...
Code => '$a() = $SUCC($b());',
π pp_beginwrap
adds BEGIN-block wrapping to code for the generated .pm file π
π pp_bless
sets the package to which the XS code is added (default is PDL) π
π pp_boundscheck
controls the state of PDL bounds checking activity π¦
π pp_core_importList
specifies what is imported from PDL::Core π§Ί
π pp_def
defines a new PDL function π οΈ
π pp_deprecate_module
adds runtime and POD warnings about a module being deprecated β οΈ
π pp_done
marks the end of PDL::PP definitions in the file π
π pp_export_nothing
clears out the export list for your generated module π§Ή
π pp_line_numbers
adds line number information to simplify debugging of PDL::PP code π
β¨ OVERVIEW β¨
okay so before we get into the whole vibe: thereβs another intro to PDL::PP out there, bestie β Practical Magick with C, PDL, and PDL::PP -- a guide to compiled add-ons for PDL, at https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.07753. Itβs giving extra context, fr fr.
why do we even need PP? several reasons, no cap. firstly, we want to be able to generate subroutine code for each of the PDL datatypes (PDL_Byte, PDL_Short, etc). AUTOMATICALLY. secondly, when youβre referring to slices of PDL arrays in Perl (e.g. $x->slice('0:10:2,:') or other things such as transposes), itβs nice to be able to do this transparently and to be able to do this βin-placeβ β i.e. not to have to make a memory copy of the section. PP handles all the necessary element and offset arithmetic for you. there are also the notions of broadcasting (repeated calling of the same routine for multiple slices, see PDL::Indexing) and dataflow (see PDL::Dataflow, and "DefaultFlow") which use of PP allows.
in much of what follows weβre assuming you already know the concepts of implicit and explicit broadcasting and index manipulations within PDL. If you havenβt heard of these concepts or arenβt very comfortable with them, itβs time to check PDL::Indexing, bestie. π«Ά
as you may appreciate from its name, PDL::PP is a Pre-Processor, i.e. it expands code via substitutions to make real C-code. Technically, the output is XS code (see perlxs) but that is very close to C.
so how do you use PP? for the most part you just write ordinary C code except for special PP constructs which take the form:
$something(something else)
or:
PPfunction %{
<stuff>
%}
the most important PP construct is the form $array(). Consider this very simple PP function to sum the elements of a 1D vector (in fact this is very similar to the actual code used by 'sumover'):
pp_def('sumit',
Pars => 'a(n); [o]b();',
Code => q{
double tmp;
tmp = 0;
loop(n) %{
tmp += $a();
%}
$b() = tmp;
}
);
whatβs going on? the Pars => line is very important for PP β it specifies all the arguments and their dimensionality. We call this the signature of the PP function (compare also the explanations in PDL::Indexing). In this case the routine takes a 1-D function as input and returns a 0-D scalar as output. The $a() PP construct is used to access elements of the array a(n) for you β PP fills in all the required C code. β¨
you will notice that weβre using the q{} single-quote operator. This is not an accident. You generally want to use single quotes to denote your PP Code sections. PDL::PP uses $var() for its parsing and if you donβt use single quotes, Perl will try to interpolate $var(). Also, using the single quote q operator with curly braces makes it look like you are creating a code block, which is What You Mean. (Perl is smart enough to look for nested curly braces and not close the quote until it finds the matching curly brace, so itβs safe to have nested blocks.) Under other circumstances, such as when youβre stitching together a Code block using string concatenations, itβs often easiest to use real single quotes as
Code => 'something'.$interpolatable.'somethingelse;'
in the simple case here where all elements are accessed, the PP construct loop(n) %{ ... %} is used to loop over all elements in dimension n. Note this feature of PP: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SPECIFIED BY NAME.
this is made clearer if we avoid the PP loop() construct and write the loop explicitly using conventional C:
pp_def('sumit',
Pars => 'a(n); [o]b();',
Code => q{
PDL_Indx i,n_size;
double tmp;
n_size = $SIZE(n);
tmp = 0;
for(i=0; i<n_size; i++) {
tmp += $a(n=>i);
}
$b() = tmp;
},
);
which does the same as before, but is more long-winded. You can see to get element i of a() we say $a(n=>i) β weβre specifying the dimension by name n. In 2D we might say:
Pars=>'a(m,n);',
...
tmp += $a(m=>i,n=>j);
...
the syntax m=>i borrows from Perl hashes, which are in fact used in the implementation of PP. One could also say $a(n=>j,m=>i) as order is not important. π
you can also see in the above example the use of another PP construct β $SIZE(n) to get the length of the dimension n.
it should, however, be noted that you shouldnβt write an explicit C-loop when you could have used the PP loop construct since PDL::PP checks automatically the loop limits for you, usage of loop makes the code more concise, etc. But there are certainly situations where you need explicit control of the loop and now you know how to do it ;).
to revisit βWhy PP?β β the above code for sumit() will be generated for each data-type. It will operate on slices of arrays βin-placeβ. It will broadcast automatically β e.g. if a 2D array is given it will be called repeatedly for each 1D row (again check PDL::Indexing for the details of broadcasting). And then b() will be a 1D array of sums of each row. We could call it with $x->transpose to sum the columns instead. And Dataflow tracing etc. will be available. π₯
you can see PP saves the programmer from writing a lot of needlessly repetitive C-code β in our opinion this is one of the best features of PDL making writing new C subroutines for PDL an amazingly concise exercise. A second reason is the ability to make PP expand your concise code definitions into different C code based on the needs of the computer architecture in question. Imagine for example you are lucky to have a supercomputer at your hands; in that case you want PDL::PP certainly to generate code that takes advantage of the vectorising/parallel computing features of your machine (this a project for the future). In any case, the bottom line is that your unchanged code should still expand to working XS code even if the internals of PDL changed.
also, because you are generating the code in an actual Perl script, there are many fun things that you can do. Letβs say that you need to write both sumit (as above) and multit. With a little bit of creativity, we can do
for({Name => 'sumit', Init => '0', Op => '+='},
{Name => 'multit', Init => '1', Op => '*='}) {
pp_def($_->{Name},
Pars => 'a(n); [o]b();',
Code => '
double tmp;
tmp = '.$_->{Init}.';
loop(n) %{
tmp '.$_->{Op}.' $a();
%}
$b() = tmp;
');
}
which defines both the functions easily. Now, if you later need to change the signature or dimensionality or whatever, you only need to change one place in your code. Yeah, sure, your editor does have βcut and pasteβ and βsearch and replaceβ but itβs still less bothersome and definitely more difficult to forget just one place and have strange bugs creep in. Also, adding 'orit' (bitwise or) later is a one-liner. π
and remember, you really have Perlβs full abilities with you β you can very easily read any input file and make routines from the information in that file. For simple cases like the above, the author (Tjl) currently favors the hash syntax like the above β itβs not too much more characters than the corresponding array syntax but much easier to understand and change.
as of 2.064, the Code must not just return, since the signature of the generated functions has changed from returning void to returning a pdl_error, which is pre-initialised to a successful return value. You can easily just replace the return; with return PDL_err;, which is the variableβs name.
we should mention here also the ability to get the pointer to the beginning of the data in memory β a prerequisite for interfacing PDL to some libraries. This is handled with the $P(var) directive, see below.
when starting work on a new pp_def'ined function, if you make a mistake, you will usually find a pile of compiler errors indicating line numbers in the generated XS file. If you know how to read XS files (or if you want to learn the hard way), you could open the generated XS file and search for the line number with the error. However, a recent addition to PDL::PP helps report the correct line number of your errors: pp_line_numbers. Working with the original summit example, if you had a mis-spelling of tmp in your code, you could change the (erroneous) code to something like this and the compiler would give you much more useful information:
pp_def('sumit',
Pars => 'a(n); [o]b();',
Code => pp_line_numbers(__LINE__, q{
double tmp;
tmp = 0;
loop(n) %{
tmp += $a();
%}
$b() = rmp;
})
);
for the above situation, my compiler tells me:
...
test.pd:15: error: 'rmp' undeclared (first use in this function)
...
in my example script (called test.pd), line 15 is exactly the line at which I made my typo: "rmp" instead of "tmp". π
so, after this quick overview of the general flavour of programming PDL routines using PDL::PP letβs summarise in which circumstances you should actually use this preprocessor/precompiler. You should use PDL::PP if you want to
- interface PDL to some external library
- write some algorithm that would be slow if coded in Perl (this is not as often as you think; take a look at broadcasting and dataflow first).
- be a PDL developer (and even then itβs not obligatory)
π¨ WARNING π¨
because of its architecture, PDL::PP can be both flexible and easy to use on the one hand, yet exuberantly complicated at the same time. Currently, part of the problem is that error messages are not very informative and if something goes wrong, youβd better know what you are doing and be able to hack your way through the internals (or be able to figure out by trial and error what is wrong with your args to pp_def). Although work is being done to produce better warnings, do not be afraid to send your questions to the mailing list if you run into trouble. π
β¨ DESCRIPTION β¨
Okay so now that you've got a vibe for how pp_def defines new PDL functions, bestie, it's literally time to unpack the general syntax of pp_def. π
pp_def takes as arguments first the name of the function you're defining and then a hash list that can contain various keys.
Based on these keys PP generates XS code and a .pm file. The function pp_done (see example in the SYNOPSIS) is used to tell PDL::PP that there are no more definitions in this file and it is time to generate the .xs and .pm file.
As a consequence, there may be several pp_def() calls inside a file (by convention files with PP code have the extension .pd or .pp) but generally only one pp_done().
There are two main different types of usage of pp_def(), the 'data operation' and 'slice operation' prototypes.
The 'data operation' is used to take some data, mangle it and output some other data; this includes for example the + operation, matrix inverse, sumover etc and all the examples we have talked about in this document so far. Implicit and explicit broadcasting and the creation of the result are taken care of automatically in those operations. You can even do dataflow with sumit, sumover, etc (don't be dismayed if you don't understand the concept of dataflow in PDL very well yet; it is still very much experimental).
The 'slice operation' is a different kind of operation: in a slice operation, you are not changing any data, you are defining correspondences between different elements of two ndarrays (examples include the index manipulation/slicing function definitions in the file slices.pd that is part of the PDL distribution; but beware, this is not introductory level stuff).
To support bad values, additional keys are required for pp_def, as explained below.
If you are just interested in communicating with some external library (for example some linear algebra/matrix library), you'll usually want the 'data operation' so we are going to discuss that first.
π DATA OPERATION π
πΈ A simple example πΈ
In the data operation, you must know what dimensions of data you need. First, an example with scalars:
pp_def('add',
Pars => 'a(); b(); [o]c();',
Code => '$c() = $a() + $b();'
);
That looks a little strange but let's dissect it. The first line is easy: we're defining a routine with the name add. The second line simply declares our parameters and the parentheses mean that they are scalars. We call the string that defines our parameters and their dimensionality the signature of that function. For its relevance with regard to broadcasting and index manipulations check the PDL::Indexing man page.
The third line is the actual operation. You need to use the dollar signs and parentheses to refer to your parameters (this will probably change at some point in the future, once a good syntax is found).
These lines are all that is necessary to actually define the function for PDL (well, actually it isn't; you additionally need to write a Makefile.PL (see below) and build the module (something like perl Makefile.PL; make); but let's ignore that for the moment). So now you can do
use MyModule;
$x = pdl 2,3,4;
$y = pdl 5;
$c = add($x,$y);
# or
add($x,$y,($c=null)); # Alternative form, useful if $c has been
# preset to something big, not useful here.
and have broadcasting work correctly (the result is $c == [7 8 9]). π
π The Pars section: the signature of a PP function π
Seeing the above example code you will most probably ask: what is this strange $c=null syntax in the second call to our new add function? If you take another look at the definition of add you will notice that the third argument c is flagged with the qualifier [o] which tells PDL::PP that this is an output argument. So the above call to add means 'create a new $c from scratch with correct dimensions' β null is a special token for 'empty ndarray' (you might ask why we haven't used the value undef to flag this instead of the PDL specific null; we are currently thinking about it ;).
[This should be explained in some other section of the manual as well!!]
The reason for having this syntax as an alternative is that if you have really huge ndarrays, you can do
$c = PDL->null;
for(some long loop) {
# munge a,b
add($x,$y,$c);
# munge c, put something back to x,y
}
and avoid allocating and deallocating $c each time. It is allocated once at the first add() and thereafter the memory stays until $c is destroyed.
If you just say
$c = add($x,$y);
the code generated by PP will automatically fill in $c=null and return the result. If you want to learn more about the reasons why PDL::PP supports this style where output arguments are given as last arguments check the PDL::Indexing man page.
[o] is not the only qualifier a pdl argument can have in the signature. Another important qualifier is the [t] option which flags a pdl as temporary. What does that mean? You tell PDL::PP that this pdl is only used for temporary results in the course of the calculation and you are not interested in its value after the computation has been completed. But why should PDL::PP want to know about this in the first place? The reason is closely related to the concepts of pdl auto creation (you heard about that above) and implicit broadcasting. If you use implicit broadcasting the dimensionality of automatically created pdls is actually larger than that specified in the signature. With [o] flagged pdls will be created so that they have the additional dimensions as required by the number of implicit broadcast dimensions. When creating a temporary pdl, however, it will always only be made big enough so that it can hold the result for one iteration in a broadcast loop, i.e. as large as required by the signature. So less memory is wasted when you flag a pdl as temporary. Secondly, you can use output auto creation with temporary pdls even when you are using explicit broadcasting which is forbidden for normal output pdls flagged with [o] (see PDL::Indexing).
As of 2.073, the user is unable to pass a [t] parameter, and PDL will create and size it to its notional size, times the number of threads.
Here is an example where we use the [t] qualifier. We define the function callf that calls a C routine f which needs a temporary array of the same size and type as the array a (sorry about the forward reference for $P; it's a pointer access, see below):
pp_def('callf',
Pars => 'a(n); [t] tmp(n); [o] b()',
Code => 'PDL_Indx ns = $SIZE(n);
f($P(a),$P(b),$P(tmp),ns);
'
);
Another possible qualifier is [phys]. If given, this means the pdl will have make_physical in PDL::Core called on it.
Additionally, if it has a specified dimension d that has value 1, d will not magically be grown if d is larger in another pdl with specified dimension d, and instead an exception will be thrown. E.g.:
pp_def('callf',
Pars => 'a(n); [phys] b(n); [o] c()',
# ...
);
If a had lead dimension of 2 and b of 3, an exception will always be thrown. However, if b has lead dimension of 1, it would be silently repeated as if it were 2, if it were not a phys parameter.
π¦ Argument dimensions and the signature π¦
Now we have just talked about dimensions of pdls and the signature. How are they related? Let's say that we want to add a scalar + the index number to a vector:
pp_def('add2',
Pars => 'a(n); b(); [o]c(n);',
Code => 'loop(n) %{
$c() = $a() + $b() + n;
%}'
);
There are several points to notice here: first, the Pars argument now contains the n arguments to show that we have a single dimensions in a and c. It is important to note that dimensions are actual entities that are accessed by name so this declares a and c to have the same first dimensions. In most PP definitions the size of named dimensions will be set from the respective dimensions of non-output pdls (those with no [o] flag) but sometimes you might want to set the size of a named dimension explicitly through an integer parameter. See below in the description of the OtherPars section how that works.
π Constant argument dimensions in the signature π
Suppose you want an output ndarray to be created automatically and you know that on every call its dimension will have the same size (say 9) regardless of the dimensions of the input ndarrays. In this case you use the following syntax in the Pars section to specify the size of the dimension:
' [o] y(n=9); '
As expected, extra dimensions required by broadcasting will be created if necessary. If you need to assign a named dimension according to a more complicated formula (than a constant) you must use the RedoDimsCode key described below.
β Type conversions and the signature β
The signature also determines the type conversions that will be performed when a PP function is invoked. So what happens when we invoke one of our previously defined functions with pdls of different type, e.g.
add2($x,$y,($ret=null));
where $x is of type PDL_Float and $y of type PDL_Short? With the signature as shown in the definition of add2 above the datatype of the operation (as determined at runtime) is that of the pdl with the 'highest' type (sequence is byte < short < ushort < long < float < double). In the add2 example the datatype of the operation is float ($x has that datatype). All pdl arguments are then type converted to that datatype (they are not converted inplace but a copy with the right type is created if a pdl argument doesn't have the type of the operation). Null pdls don't contribute a type in the determination of the type of the operation. However, they will be created with the datatype of the operation; here, for example, $ret will be of type float. You should be aware of these rules when calling PP functions with pdls of different types to take the additional storage and runtime requirements into account. π
Okay so these type conversions are literally correct for most functions you normally define with pp_def. But bestie, there are certain cases where slightly modified type-conversion behaviour is desired. For those cases you can use additional qualifiers in the signature to specify the desired properties with regard to type conversion. And yes, these qualifiers can be combined with the creation qualifiers we already met ([o] and [t]). Letβs go through the list of qualifiers that change type-conversion behaviour. π
The most important is the indx qualifier, which comes in handy when a pdl argument represents indices into another pdl. Letβs take a look at an example from PDL::Ufunc:
pp_def('maximum_ind',
Pars => 'a(n); indx [o] b()',
Code => '$GENERIC() cur;
PDL_Indx curind;
loop(n) %{
if (!n || $a() > cur) {cur = $a(); curind = n;}
%}
$b() = curind;',
);
The function maximum_ind finds the index of the largest element of a vector. If you look at the signature you notice that the output argument b has been declared with the additional indx qualifier. This has the following consequences for type conversions: regardless of the type of the input pdl a the output pdl b will be of type PDL_Indx, which makes sense since b will represent an index into a. β¨
Note that curind is declared as type PDL_Indx and not indx. While most datatype declarations in the Pars section use the same name as the underlying C type, indx is a type which is sufficient to handle PDL indexing operations. For 32-bit installs, it can be a 32-bit integer type. For 64-bit installs, it will be a 64-bit integer type. π«Ά
Furthermore, if you call the function with an existing output pdl b its type will not influence the datatype of the operation (see above). Hence, even if a is of a smaller type than b it will not be converted to match the type of b but stays untouched, which saves memory and CPU cycles and is the right thing to do when b represents indices. Also note that you can use the indx qualifier together with other qualifiers (the [o] and [t] qualifiers). Order is significant β type qualifiers precede creation qualifiers ([o] and [t]). π
The above example also demonstrates typical usage of the $GENERIC() macro. It expands to the current type in a so called generic loop. What is a generic loop? As you already heard a PP function has a runtime datatype as determined by the type of the pdl arguments it has been invoked with. The PP generated XS code for this function therefore contains a switch like switch (type) {case PDL_Byte: ... case PDL_Double: ...} that selects a case based on the runtime datatype of the function (itβs called a type βloopβ because there is a loop in PP code that generates the cases). In any case your code is inserted once for each PDL type into this switch statement. The $GENERIC() macro just expands to the respective type in each copy of your parsed code in this switch statement, e.g., in the case PDL_Byte section cur will expand to PDL_Byte and so on for the other case statements. I guess you realise that this is a useful macro to hold values of pdls in some code. π
There are a couple of other qualifiers with similar effects as indx. For your convenience there are the float and double qualifiers with analogous consequences on type conversions as indx. Letβs assume you have a very large array for which you want to compute row and column sums with an equivalent of the sumover function. However, with the normal definition of sumover you might run into problems when your data is, e.g. of type short. A call like
sumover($large_pdl,($sums = null));
will result in $sums be of type short and is therefore prone to overflow errors if $large_pdl is a very large array. On the other hand calling
@dims = $large_pdl->dims; shift @dims;
sumover($large_pdl,($sums = zeroes(double,@dims)));
is not a good alternative either. Now we donβt have overflow problems with $sums but at the expense of a type conversion of $large_pdl to double, something bad if this is really a large pdl. Thatβs where double comes in handy:
pp_def('sumoverd',
Pars => 'a(n); double [o] b()',
Code => 'double tmp=0;
loop(n) %{ tmp += a(); %}
$b() = tmp;',
);
This gets us around the type conversion and overflow problems. Again, analogous to the indx qualifier double results in b always being of type double regardless of the type of a without leading to a type conversion of a as a side effect. π¦
There is also a special type, real. The others above are all actual PDL/C datatypes, but real is a modifier; if the operation type is real, it has no effect; if it is complex, then the parameter will be the real version β so cdouble becomes double, etc. πΈ
There is also the converse, complex. If the operation is already complex, there is no effect; if not, the output will be promoted to the typeβs complexversion in PDL::Type, which defaults to cfloat. Note this is controlled both by the PDL::Types data, and the code in PDL::PP. NB Because this outputs floating-point data, the inputs will by definition be turned into such. Therefore, it only makes sense to have floating-point GenericTypes inputs. If you want to default to coercing inputs to float, give that as the last GenericTypes as the generated XS function defaults to the last-given one. Hence (with PMCode and Doc omitted):
pp_def('r2C',
GenericTypes=>[reverse qw(F D G C)], # last one is default so here = F
Pars => 'r(); complex [o]c()',
Code => '$c() = $r();'
);
Finally, there are the type+ qualifiers where type is one of int or float. What shall that mean. Letβs illustrate the int+ qualifier with the actual definition of sumover:
pp_def('sumover',
Pars => 'a(n); int+ [o] b()',
Code => '$GENERIC(b) tmp=0;
loop(n) %{ tmp += a(); %}
$b() = tmp;',
);
As we had already seen for the int, float and double qualifiers, a pdl marked with a type+ qualifier does not influence the datatype of the pdl operation. Its meaning is βmake this pdl at least of type type or higher, as required by the type of the operationβ. In the sumover example this means that when you call the function with an a of type PDL_Short the output pdl will be of type PDL_Long (just as would have been the case with the int qualifier). This again tries to avoid overflow problems when using small datatypes (e.g. byte images). However, when the datatype of the operation is higher than the type specified in the type+ qualifier b will be created with the datatype of the operation, e.g. when a is of type double then b will be double as well. We hope you agree that this is sensible behaviour for sumover. It should be obvious how the float+ qualifier works by analogy. It may become necessary to be able to specify a set of alternative types for the parameters. However, this will probably not be implemented until someone comes up with a reasonable use for it. π
Note that we now had to specify the $GENERIC macro with the name of the pdl to derive the type from that argument. Why is that? If you carefully followed our explanations you will have realised that in some cases b will have a different type than the type of the operation. Calling the '$GENERIC' macro with b as argument makes sure that the type will always the same as that of b in that part of the generic loop. π
This is about all there is to say about the Pars section in a pp_def call. You should remember that this section defines the signature of a PP defined function, you can use several options to qualify certain arguments as output and temporary args and all dimensions that you can later refer to in the Code section are defined by name.
It is important that you understand the meaning of the signature since in the latest PDL versions you can use it to define broadcasting functions from within Perl, i.e. what we call Perl level broadcasting. Please check PDL::Indexing for details. π
π» The Code section π»
The Code section contains the actual XS code that will be in the innermost part of a broadcast loop (if you donβt know what a broadcast loop is then you still havenβt read PDL::Indexing; do it now ;) after any PP macros (like $GENERIC) and PP functions have been expanded (like the loop function we are going to explain next). π§
Letβs quickly reiterate the sumover example:
pp_def('sumover',
Pars => 'a(n); int+ [o] b()',
Code => '$GENERIC(b) tmp=0;
loop(n) %{ tmp += a(); %}
$b() = tmp;',
);
The loop construct in the Code section also refers to the dimension name so you donβt need to specify any limits: the loop is correctly sized and everything is done for you, again. β¨
Next, there is the surprising fact that $a() and $b() do not contain the index. This is not necessary because weβre looping over n and both variables know which dimensions they have so they automatically know theyβre being looped over. πΈ
This feature comes in very handy in many places and makes for much shorter code. Of course, there are times when you want to circumvent this; here is a function which make a matrix symmetric and serves as an example of how to code explicit looping:
pp_def('symm',
Pars => 'a(n,n); [o]c(n,n);',
Code => 'loop(n) %{
int n2;
for(n2=n; n2<$SIZE(n); n2++) {
$c(n0 => n, n1 => n2) =
$c(n0 => n2, n1 => n) =
$a(n0 => n, n1 => n2);
}
%}
'
);
Okay so let's dissect what's actually happening here, bestie. First question: what is this function even supposed to do? From its signature you can see it takes a 2D matrix with equal numbers of columns and rows and outputs a matrix of the same size. From a given input matrix $a it computes a symmetric output matrix $c β symmetric in the matrix sense that A^T = A where ^T means matrix transpose, or in PDL parlance $c == $c->transpose. It does this by using only the values on and below the diagonal of $a. In the output matrix $c all values on and below the diagonal are the same as those in $a while those above the diagonal are a mirror image of those below the diagonal (above and below are here interpreted the way PDL prints 2D pdls). If this explanation still sounds a bit strange just go ahead, make a little file into which you write this definition, build the new PDL extension (see section on Makefiles for PP code) and try it out with a couple of examples. β¨
Having explained what the function is supposed to do there are a couple of points worth noting from the syntactical point of view. First, we get the size of the dimension named n again by using the $SIZE macro. Second, there are suddenly these funny n0 and n1 index names in the code though the signature defines only the dimension n. Why this? The reason becomes clear when you note that both the first and second dimension of $a and $b are named n in the signature of symm. This tells PDL::PP that the first and second dimension of these arguments should have the same size. Otherwise the generated function will raise a runtime error. However, now in an access to $a and $c PDL::PP cannot figure out which index n refers to any more just from the name of the index. Therefore, the indices with equal dimension names get numbered from left to right starting at 0, e.g. in the above example n0 refers to the first dimension of $a and $c, n1 to the second and so on. π
In all examples so far, we have only used the Pars and Code members of the hash that was passed to pp_def. There are certainly other keys that are recognised by PDL::PP and we will hear about some of them in the course of this document. Find a (non-exhaustive) list of keys in Appendix A. A list of macros and PPfunctions (we have only encountered some of those in the examples above yet) that are expanded in values of the hash argument to pp_def is summarised in Appendix B. π
At this point, it might be appropriate to mention that PDL::PP is not a completely static, well designed set of routines (as Tuomas puts it: "stop thinking of PP as a set of routines carved in stone") but rather a collection of things that the PDL::PP author (Tuomas J. Lukka) considered he would have to write often into his PDL extension routines. PP tries to be expandable so that in the future, as new needs arise, new common code can be abstracted back into it. If you want to learn more on why you might want to change PDL::PP and how to do it check the section on PDL::PP internals. π
πΈ Handling bad values πΈ
There are several keys and macros used when writing code to handle bad values. The first one is the HandleBad key:
HandleBad => 0β This flags a pp-routine as NOT handling bad values. If this routine is sent ndarrays with theirbadflagset, then a warning message is printed to STDOUT and the ndarrays are processed as if the value used to represent bad values is a valid number. Thebadflagvalue is not propagated to the output ndarrays. An example of when this is used is for FFT routines, which generally do not have a way of ignoring part of the data. πHandleBad => 1β This causes PDL::PP to write extra code that ensures the BadCode section is used, and that the$ISBAD()macro (and its brethren) work. If noBadCodeis supplied, theCodesection will be used, on the assumption it will usePDL_IF_BADto handle bad values. π₯HandleBadis not given β If any of the input ndarrays have theirbadflagset, then the output ndarrays will have theirbadflagset, but any supplied BadCode is ignored. π
The value of HandleBad is used to define the contents of the BadDoc key, if it is not given.
To handle bad values, code must be written somewhat differently; for instance,
$c() = $a() + $b();
becomes something like
if ( $a() != BADVAL && $b() != BADVAL ) {
$c() = $a() + $b();
} else {
$c() = BADVAL;
}
However, we only want the second version if bad values are present in the input ndarrays (and that bad-value support is wanted!) β otherwise we actually want the original code. This is where the BadCode key comes in; you use it to specify the code to execute if bad values may be present, and PP uses both it and the Code section to create something like:
if ( bad_values_are_present ) {
fancy_broadcastloop_stuff {
BadCode
}
} else {
fancy_broadcastloop_stuff {
Code
}
}
This approach means that there is virtually no overhead when bad values are not present (i.e. the badflag routine returns 0). π¦
The C preprocessor symbol PDL_BAD_CODE is defined when the bad code is compiled, so that you can reduce the amount of code you write. The BadCode section can use the same macros and looping constructs as the Code section. As of 2.073, you can also use PDL_IF_BAD(iftrue,iffalse).
π¦ Other bad-value macros π¦
However, it wouldn't be much use without the following additional macros:
$ISBAD(var)β To check whether an ndarray's value is bad, use the$ISBADmacro:
if ( $ISBAD(a()) ) { printf("a() is bad\n"); }
You can also access given elements of an ndarray:
if ( $ISBAD(a(n=>l)) ) { printf("element %d of a() is bad\n", l); }
$ISGOOD(var)β This is the opposite of the$ISBADmacro.$SETBAD(var)β For when you want to set an element of an ndarray bad.$ISBADVAR(c_var,pdl)β If you have cached the value of an ndarray$a()into a c-variable (foosay), then to check whether it is bad, use$ISBADVAR(foo,a).$ISGOODVAR(c_var,pdl)β As above, but this time checking that the cached value isn't bad.$SETBADVAR(c_var,pdl)β To copy the bad value for an ndarray into a c variable, use$SETBADVAR(foo,a).
TODO: mention the FindBadStatusCode and CopyBadStatusCode options to pp_def, as well as the BadDoc key. π
TODO: mention $PPISBAD() etc macros. π
π PDL STATE macros π
If you want access to the value of the badflag for a given ndarray, you can use the PDL STATE macros:
$ISPDLSTATEBAD(pdl)$ISPDLSTATEGOOD(pdl)$SETPDLSTATEBAD(pdl)$SETPDLSTATEGOOD(pdl)
π Bad-value examples π
Using these macros, the above code could be specified as:
Code => '$c() = $a() + $b();',
BadCode => '
if ( $ISBAD(a()) || $ISBAD(b()) ) {
$SETBAD(c());
} else {
$c() = $a() + $b();
}',
Since this is Perl, TMTOWTDI, so you could also write:
BadCode => '
if ( $ISGOOD(a()) && $ISGOOD(b()) ) {
$c() = $a() + $b();
} else {
$SETBAD(c());
}',
You can reduce code repetition using the C PDL_BAD_CODE macro, supplying only the Code section:
Code => '
#ifdef PDL_BAD_CODE
if ( $ISGOOD(a()) && $ISGOOD(b()) ) {
#endif PDL_BAD_CODE
$c() = $a() + $b();
#ifdef PDL_BAD_CODE
} else {
$SETBAD(c());
}
#endif PDL_BAD_CODE
',
As of 2.073, you can also use PDL_IF_BAD(iftrue,iffalse):
Code => '
PDL_IF_BAD(if ( $ISGOOD(a()) && $ISGOOD(b()) ) {,)
$c() = $a() + $b();
PDL_IF_BAD(} else $SETBAD(c());,)
',
π Interfacing your own/library functions using PP π
Now, consider the following: you have your own C function (that may in fact be part of some library you want to interface to PDL) which takes as arguments two pointers to vectors of double:
void myfunc(int n,double *v1,double *v2);
The correct way of defining the PDL function is
pp_def('myfunc',
Pars => 'a(n); [o]b(n);',
GenericTypes => ['D'],
Code => 'myfunc($SIZE(n),$P(a),$P(b));'
);
The $P("par") syntax returns a pointer to the first element and the other elements are guaranteed to lie after that. π«Ά
Notice that here it is possible to make many mistakes. First, $SIZE(n) must be used instead of n. Second, you shouldn't put any loops in this code. Third, here we encounter a new hash key recognised by PDL::PP: the GenericTypes declaration tells PDL::PP to ONLY GENERATE THE TYPELOOP FOP THE LIST OF TYPES SPECIFIED. In this case double. This has two advantages. Firstly the size of the compiled code is reduced vastly, secondly if non-double arguments are passed to myfunc() PDL will automatically convert them to double before passing to the external C routine and convert them back afterwards. π
One can also use Pars to qualify the types of individual arguments. Thus one could also write this as:
pp_def('myfunc',
Pars => 'double a(n); double [o]b(n);',
Code => 'myfunc($SIZE(n),$P(a),$P(b));'
);
The type specification in Pars exempts the argument from variation in the typeloop β rather it is automatically converted to and from the type specified. This is obviously useful in a more general example, e.g.:
void myfunc(int n,float *v1,long *v2);
pp_def('myfunc',
Pars => 'float a(n); long [o]b(n);',
GenericTypes => ['F'],
Code => 'myfunc($SIZE(n),$P(a),$P(b));'
);
Note we still use GenericTypes to reduce the size of the type loop, obviously PP could in principle spot this and do it automatically though the code has yet to attain that level of sophistication!
Finally note when types are converted automatically one MUST use the [o] qualifier for output variables or you hard-won changes will get optimised away by PP! ππ
If you interface a large library you can automate the interfacing even further. Perl can help you again(!) in doing this. In many libraries you have certain calling conventions. This can be exploited. In short, you can write a little parser (which is really not difficult in Perl) that then generates the calls to pp_def from parsed descriptions of the functions in that library. For an example, please check the Slatec interface in the Lib tree of the PDL distribution. If you want to check (during debugging) which calls to PP functions your Perl code generated a little helper package comes in handy which replaces the PP functions by identically named ones that dump their arguments to stdout. π§
Just say
β¦legit perl -MPDL::PP::Dump myfile.pd is the cheat code to see all the calls to pp_def and its little friends π«Ά. Try it on ops.pd and slatec.pd bestie, it's giving x-ray vision. And if you're feeling β¨curiousβ¨ (or wanna make it even better), the source lives in Basic/Gen/PP/Dump.pm π
Other macros in the Code section π
So far we've met $SIZE, $GENERIC and $P. Now we're speedrunning the other macros that get expanded inside the Code section of PDL::PP, with examples so you actually get it π
$T π
$T is your type-switch girlie. Genuinely so useful when you gotta call different external (read: library) functions depending on the input type of your args. The general syntax is:
$Ttypeletters(type_alternatives)
where typeletters is a permutation of a subset of the letters BSULNQFDGC β those stand for Byte, Short, Ushort, etc. β and type_alternatives is what it expands to when the PP operation's type matches the letter in question β¨ Let's make that cryptic-ass description make sense with an example. Say you've got two C functions with prototypes:
void float_func(float *in, float *out);
void double_func(double *in, double *out);
They do basically the same thing, one just takes float pointers and the other takes double pointers. You can interface them to PDL by defining a generic function foofunc (which calls the right function depending on the type of the transformation):
pp_def('foofunc',
Pars => ' a(n); [o] b();',
Code => ' $TFD(float,double)_func ($P(a),$P(b));'
GenericTypes => [qw(F D)],
);
Heads up bestie: there's a limitation β the comma-separated values cannot have parentheses π
$PP β
$PP is for so-called physical pointer access. "Physical" here is referring to some internal optimisations of PDL (if you're familiar with the PDL core, we're talking about the vaffine optimisations π). This macro is mainly for internal use, so ngl you shouldn't need it in any of your normal code. iykyk π
$PPSYM π¦
The $PPSYM() macro gets replaced by the value of ppsym in PDL::Types for the loop type, or that of the given parameter β similar to $GENERIC(). Super handy for stuff like macros that vary by that, so you avoid needing things like $TXY(X,Y) β¨ Bonus: if an operation's GenericTypes gets extended, this macro stays correct. Ate, no crumbs π
$COMP (and the OtherPars section) π
$COMP accesses non-pdl values inside the code section. Its name comes from how transformations are implemented in PDL. The variables you can refer to using $COMP are members of the "compiled" structure that represents the PDL transformation in question β but it doesn't yet contain any info about dimensions (peep PDL::Internals for the deep lore). The thing is, you can totally treat $COMP like a black box without knowing anything about how transformations are implemented in PDL π«Ά
So when do you actually use it? Mainly to access values of arguments declared in the OtherPars section of a pp_def definition. But wait β you haven't even heard about the OtherPars key yet?! π Let's do another example showing typical usage of both new features:
pp_def('pnmout',
Pars => 'a(m)',
OtherPars => "PerlIO *fp",
GenericTypes => [qw(B U S L)],
Code => '
if (PerlIO_write($COMP(fp),$P(a),len) != len)
$CROAK("Error writing pnm file");
');
This function writes data from a pdl to a file. The file descriptor is passed as a string into the function. That param does not go in the Pars section (it can't really be treated like a pdl), it goes in the aptly named OtherPars section π Parameters in OtherPars follow those in Pars when you invoke the function, i.e.:
open FILE,">out.dat" or die "couldn't open out.dat";
pnmout($pdl,'FILE');
When you wanna access this parameter inside the code section, you gotta tell PP via the $COMP macro β so you write $COMP(fp) like in the example. Otherwise PP wouldn't know that the fp you're referring to is the same one from the OtherPars section, and that's just chaos πΈ
Another use for OtherPars: setting a named dimension in the signature β¨ Here's how:
pp_def('setdim',
Pars => '[o] a(n)',
OtherPars => 'int ns => n',
Code => 'loop(n) %{ $a() = n; %}',
);
This says the named dimension n gets initialised from the value of the other parameter ns, which is of integer type (yep, we're using the CType From => named_dim syntax π
). Now you call it the usual way:
setdim(($x=null),5);
print $x;
[ 0 1 2 3 4 ]
Not gonna lie, this function is not very useful, but it shows how it works π If you call it with an existing pdl, you don't need to explicitly specify the size of n β PDL::PP can figure it out from the dimensions of the non-null pdl. In that case you just pass the dimension parameter as -1:
$x = hist($y);
setdim($x,-1);
The default values available via $COMP() are the OtherPars as noted above, and they get copied in. But β plot twist β this can be added to (and previous to 2.058, replaced) by supplying Comp and/or MakeComp keys (the defaults happen first):
pp_def(
'diagonal',
OtherPars => 'SV *list',
Comp => 'PDL_Indx whichdims_count; PDL_Indx whichdims[$COMP(whichdims_count)];',
MakeComp => '
PDL_Indx i;
PDL_Indx *tmp= PDL->packdims(list,&($COMP(whichdims_count)));
if (!tmp) $CROAK("Failed to packdims for creating");
if ($COMP(whichdims_count) < 1)
$CROAK("Diagonal: must have at least 1 dimension");
$DOCOMPALLOC(); /* malloc()s the whichdims */
for(i=0; i<$COMP(whichdims_count); i++)
$COMP(whichdims)[i] = tmp[i];
free(tmp);
/* ... */
',
# ...
);
The MakeComp code is placed in pdl_(funcname)_run, so access to Pars (which will just be pdl *s) / OtherPars values is just via their names, not a macro π
As of 2.058, you can instead give a C99 "incomplete array" type parameter as an OtherPars entry:
pp_def(
'diagonal',
OtherPars => 'PDL_Indx whichdims[]',
MakeComp => '
if ($COMP(whichdims_count) < 1)
$CROAK("Diagonal: must have at least 1 dimension");
/* ... */
',
# ...
);
There's an XS typemap entry (only for PDL_Indx array types for now) that adds a (varname)_count variable β it extracts the index numbers from an array-ref parameter and sets the count variable to the right value. PP then makes a copy of the data available π¦ The C function (here, pdl_diagonal_run)'s caller (here, the generated XS function) is responsible for freeing the array passed in (here, PDL's smalloc function is used, so you don't gotta do anything different π).
Other functions in the Code section πΈ
The only PP function we've used so far in these examples is loop. But there are currently two other functions recognised in the Code section π
broadcastloop π₯
So remember how the signature of a PP-defined function sets the dimensions of all the pdl args involved in a primitive operation? Yeah, well β you often call your PP functions with pdls that have more dimensions than the signature says. In that case the primitive operation gets performed on all subslices of appropriate dimensionality, in what's called a broadcast loop (peep the overview above and PDL::Indexing for more β¨). Assuming you've got a grasp of that concept, you'll probably appreciate that the operation in the code section should be optimised, since this is the tightest loop inside a broadcast loop. But β if you look back at the pnmout example β you'll quickly realise that looking up the IO file descriptor in the inner broadcast loop is not very efficient when writing a pdl with many rows π A better move: look up the IO descriptor once outside the broadcast loop, then use its value inside the tightest broadcast loop. That is exactly where broadcastloop comes in, bestie. Here's an improved pnmout using it:
pp_def('pnmout',
Pars => 'a(m)',
OtherPars => "PerlIO *fp",
GenericTypes => [qw(B U S L)],
Code => '
int len;
len = $SIZE(m) * sizeof($GENERIC());
broadcastloop %{
if (PerlIO_write($COMP(fp),$P(a),len) != len)
$CROAK("Error writing pnm file");
%}
');
How it works: normally the C code you write in the Code section gets placed inside a broadcast loop (PP generates the appropriate wrapping C code around it). But when you explicitly use broadcastloop, PDL::PP notices and doesn't wrap your code with an additional broadcast loop π The effect? Code you write outside the broadcast loop runs only once per transformation, and just the code in the surrounding %{ ... %} pair goes in the tightest broadcast loop. This also slays when you wanna make a decision (or any other code, especially CPU-intensive stuff) only once per thread, i.e.:
pp_addhdr('
#define RAW 0
#define ASCII 1
');
pp_def('do_raworascii',
Pars => 'a(); b(); [o]c()',
OtherPars => 'int mode',
Code => ' switch ($COMP(mode)) {
case RAW:
broadcastloop %{
/* do raw stuff */
%}
break;
case ASCII:
broadcastloop %{
/* do ASCII stuff */
%}
break;
default:
$CROAK("unknown mode");
}'
);
types π
The types function works similar to the $T macro. But with types, the code in the following block (delimited by %{ and %} as usual) is executed for all those cases where the operation's datatype is any of the types represented by the letters in the argument to type, e.g.
Code => '...
types(BSUL) %{
/* do integer type operation */
%}
types(FD) %{
/* do floating point operation */
%}
...'
okay bestie, you are encouraged to use this idiom (from PDL::Math) in order to minimise effort needed to make your code work with new types:
use PDL::Types qw(types);
my @Rtypes = grep $_->real, types();
my @Ctypes = grep !$_->real, types();
# ...
my $got_complex = PDL::Core::Dev::got_complex_version($name, 2);
my $complex_bit = join "\n",
map 'types('.$_->ppsym.') %{$'.$c.'() = c'.$name.$_->floatsuffix.'($'.$x.'(),$'.$y.'());%}',
@Ctypes;
my $real_bit = join "\n",
map 'types('.$_->ppsym.') %{$'.$c.'() = '.$name.'($'.$x.'(),$'.$y.'());%}',
@Rtypes;
($got_complex ? $complex_bit : '') . $real_bit;
(although you should first check whether tgmath.h already has a type-generic version of the function you want to call, in which case the above becomes unnecessary).
π The RedoDimsCode Section π
The RedoDimsCode key is an optional key that is used to compute dimensions of ndarrays at runtime in case the standard rules for computing dimensions from the signature are not sufficient. The contents of the RedoDimsCode entry is interpreted in the same way that the Code section is interpreted-- i.e., PP macros are expanded and the result is interpreted as C code. The purpose of the code is to set the size of some dimensions that appear in the signature. Storage allocation and broadcastloops and so forth will be set up as if the computed dimension had appeared in the signature. In your code, you first compute the desired size of a named dimension in the signature according to your needs and then assign that value to it via the $SIZE() macro.
As an example, consider the following situation. You are interfacing an external library routine that requires an temporary array for workspace to be passed as an argument. Two input data arrays that are passed are p(m) and x(n). The output data array is y(n). The routine requires a workspace array with a length of n+m*m, and you'd like the storage created automatically just like it would be for any ndarray flagged with [t] or [o]. What you'd like is to say something like
pp_def( "myexternalfunc",
Pars => " p(m); x(n); [o] y; [t] work(n+m*m); ", ...
but that won't work, because PP can't interpret expressions with arithmetic in the signature. Instead you write
pp_def(
"myexternalfunc",
Pars => ' p(m); x(n); [o] y(); [t] work(wn); ',
RedoDimsCode => '$SIZE(wn) = $SIZE(n) + $SIZE(m) * $SIZE(m);',
Code => '
externalfunc( $P(p), $P(x), $SIZE(m), $SIZE(n), $P(work) );
'
);
As of 2.075, you can use the dimensions of passed-in ndarrays as they are available when the RedoDimsCode is run. Before the code in the Code section is executed PP will create the proper storage for work if it does not exist. Note that you only took the first dimension of p and x because the user may have sent ndarrays with extra broadcasting dimensions. Of course, the temporary ndarray work (note the [t] flag) should not be given any broadcast dimensions anyway.
You can also use RedoDimsCode to set the dimension of a ndarray flagged with [o]. In this case you set the dimensions for the named dimension in the signature using $SIZE() as in the preceding example. However, because the ndarray is flagged with [o] instead of [t], broadcasting dimensions will be added if required just as if the size of the dimension were computed from the signature according to the usual rules. Here is an example from PDL::Math
pp_def("polyroots",
Pars => 'cr(n); ci(n); [o]rr(m); [o]ri(m);',
RedoDimsCode => '$SIZE(m) = $SIZE(n)-1;',
The input ndarrays are the real and imaginary parts of complex coefficients of a polynomial. The output ndarrays are real and imaginary parts of the roots. There are n roots to an nth order polynomial and such a polynomial has n+1 coefficients (the zero-th through the nth). In this example, broadcasting will work correctly. That is, the first dimension of the output ndarray with have its dimension adjusted, but other broadcasting dimensions will be assigned just as if there were no RedoDimsCode.
π¦ RedoDims passed directly π¦
A RedoDimsCode value as above gets processed, including expanding macros, and adding type-generic loops. For very specific purposes, you may not want this processing done to your dimension-updating code, probably in slice-like functions.
Then, instead of passing a RedoDimsCode value, you can pass a RedoDims value (which the RedoDimsCode would otherwise get processed into). Because you will probably want to access the ndarrays, the following macros are provided. They are named assuming you will have the first parameter as PARENT and the second as CHILD, which is the case if you passed a true P2Child value, which you will basically always want to do for this scenario.
$CHILD_PTR(),$PARENT_PTR()β these expand to apdl *pointer, e.g. to pass to a PDL API function.$CHILD(),$PARENT()β these expand to a lookup intopdlstruct, e.g.$CHILD(ndims)looks up thendimsvalue for the child parameter.
πΈ RedoDims generated from EquivPDimExpr and EquivDimCheck πΈ
Another way to generate the RedoDims code is to supply a EquivPDimExpr and maybe a EquivDimCheck:
pp_def(
'xchg',
OtherPars => 'PDL_Indx n1; PDL_Indx n2;',
TwoWay => 1,
P2Child => 1,
AffinePriv => 1,
EquivDimCheck => '
if ($COMP(n1) <0) $COMP(n1) += $PARENT(broadcastids[0]);
if ($COMP(n2) <0) $COMP(n2) += $PARENT(broadcastids[0]);
if (PDLMIN($COMP(n1),$COMP(n2)) <0 ||
PDLMAX($COMP(n1),$COMP(n2)) >= $PARENT(broadcastids[0]))
$CROAK("One of dims %d, %d out of range: should be 0<=dim<%d",
$COMP(n1),$COMP(n2),$PARENT(broadcastids[0]));',
EquivPDimExpr => '
(($CDIM == $COMP(n1)) ? $COMP(n2) :
($CDIM == $COMP(n2)) ? $COMP(n1) :
$CDIM)
',
);
EquivPDimExpr is evaluated within a loop, and the value of the relevant dimension is available using the macro $CDIM as shown above.
π Typemap handling in the OtherPars section π
The OtherPars section discussed above is very often absolutely crucial when you interface external libraries with PDL. However in many cases the external libraries either use derived types or pointers of various types.
The standard way to handle this in Perl is to use a typemap file. This is discussed in some detail in perlxs in the standard Perl documentation. In PP the functionality is very similar, so you can create a typemap file in the directory where your PP file resides and when it is built it is automatically read in to figure out the appropriate translation between the C type and Perl's built-in type.
For instance the gsl_spline_init function has the following C declaration:
int gsl_spline_init(gsl_spline * spline,
const double xa[], const double ya[], size_t size);
Clearly the xa and ya arrays are candidates for being passed in as ndarrays and the size argument is just the length of these ndarrays so that can be handled by the $SIZE() macro in PP. Write an OtherPars declaration of the form
OtherPars => 'gsl_spline *spl'
and write a short typemap file which handles this type:
TYPEMAP
gsl_spline * T_PTR
and use it in the code:
pp_def('init_meat',
Pars => 'double x(n); double y(n);',
OtherPars => 'gsl_spline *spl',
Code =>'gsl_spline_init,($COMP(spl),$P(x),$P(y),$SIZE(n)));'
);
where I have removed a macro wrapper call, but that would obscure the discussion.
π Other useful PP keys in data operation definitions π
You have already heard about the OtherPars key. Currently, there are not many other keys for a data operation that will be useful in normal (whatever that is) PP programming. In fact, it would be interesting to hear about a case where you think you need more than what is provided at the moment. Please speak up on one of the PDL mailing lists. Most other keys recognised by pp_def are only really useful for what we call slice operations (see also above).
One thing that is strongly being planned is variable number of arguments, which will be a little tricky.
An incomplete list of the available keys:
π Inplace π
Setting this key marks the routine as working inplace - ie the input and output ndarrays are the same. An example is $x->inplace->sqrt() (or sqrt(inplace($x))).
Inplace => 1β Use when the routine is a unary function, such assqrt.Inplace => ['a']β If there are more than one input ndarrays, specify the name of the one that can be changed inplace using an array reference.Inplace => ['a','b']β If there are more than one output ndarray, specify the name of the input ndarray and output ndarray in a 2-element array reference. This probably isn't needed, but left in for completeness.
If bad values are being used, care must be taken to ensure the propagation of the badflag when inplace is being used; consider this excerpt from Basic/Bad/bad.pd:
pp_def('setbadtoval',HandleBad => 1,
Pars => 'a(); [o]b();',
OtherPars => 'double newval',
Inplace => 1,
CopyBadStatusCode =>
'/* propagate badflag if inplace AND it has changed */
if ( a == b && $ISPDLSTATEBAD(a) )
PDL->propagate_badflag( b, 0 );
/* always make sure the output is "good" */
$SETPDLSTATEGOOD(b);
',
...
Since this routine removes all bad values, the output ndarray had its bad flag cleared. If run inplace (so a == b), then we have to tell all the children of a that the bad flag has been cleared (to save time we make sure that we call PDL->propagate_badflag only if the input ndarray had its bad flag set).
NOTE: one idea is that the documentation for the routine could be automatically flagged to indicate that it can be executed inplace, ie something similar to howHandleBadsetsBadDocif it's not supplied (it's not an ideal solution).
π FTypes π
# in slices.pd
FTypes => {CHILD => '$COMP(totype)'},
The value is a hash-ref mapping parameter-names to an expression giving an override of the type for that parameter. The example above shows the type being overridden to the OtherPars totype.
π§ OtherParsDefaults π§
OtherPars => 'int a; int b',
OtherParsDefaults => { b => 0 },
Lowkey crucial: this lets you set default values for OtherPars. But it is an error to give a default to one that sits before another one that doesn't have a default β so keep your order cute and legal, okay? β¨
πΈ Other PDL::PP functions to support concise package definition πΈ
So far we've covered the pp_def and pp_done functions. PDL::PP also exports a handful of other functions whose whole personality is helping you write concise PDL extension package definitions β and ngl, they eat. π«Ά
π pp_addhdr
Okay so when you interface library functions like in the example above, you very often have to include extra C include files. And since the XS file is generated by PP, we need some way to make PP drop the right include directives in the right place in that generated XS file. That's literally what pp_addhdr is for. π
It's also the function you reach for when you want to define some C functions for internal use by some of the XS functions (which are mostly functions defined by pp_def). By including these functions here, you make sure that PDL::PP inserts your code before the point where the actual XS module section begins β and therefore it'll be left untouched by xsubpp (cf. the perlxs and perlxstut man pages).
A typical call would be
pp_addhdr('
#include <unistd.h> /* we need defs of XXXX */
#include "libprotos.h" /* prototypes of library functions */
#include "mylocaldecs.h" /* Local decs */
static void do_the real_work(PDL_Byte * in, PDL_Byte * out, int n)
{
/* do some calculations with the data */
}
');
This ensures that all the constants and prototypes you need will be properly included, and that you can use the internal functions defined here in the pp_defs, e.g.:
pp_def('barfoo',
Pars => ' a(n); [o] b(n)',
GenericTypes => ['B'],
Code => ' PDL_Indx ns = $SIZE(n);
do_the_real_work($P(a),$P(b),ns);
',
);
π¦ pp_addpm
In like many cases the actual PP code β meaning the arguments to pp_def calls β is only part of the package you're currently implementing. Often there's additional Perl code and XS code you'd normally have written straight into the pm and XS files, which are now automatically generated by PP. So how do you get this stuff into those dynamically generated files?? π
Fortunately there are a couple of functions, generally called pp_addXXX, that assist you with exactly that.
Let's assume you have additional Perl code that should go into the generated pm-file. Easy peasy with the pp_addpm command:
pp_addpm(<<'EOD');
=head1 NAME
PDL::Lib::Mylib -- a PDL interface to the Mylib library
=head1 DESCRIPTION
This package implements an interface to the Mylib package with full
broadcasting and indexing support (see L<PDL::Indexing>).
=cut
use PGPLOT;
=head2 use_myfunc
this function applies the myfunc operation to all the
elements of the input pdl regardless of dimensions
and returns the sum of the result
=cut
sub use_myfunc {
my $pdl = shift;
myfunc($pdl->clump(-1),($res=null));
return $res->sum;
}
EOD
β pp_add_exported
You've probably got the idea by now. In some cases you also want to export your additional functions. And to avoid getting into trouble with PP β which also messes around with the @EXPORT array β you just tell PP to add your functions to the list of exported functions:
pp_add_exported('use_myfunc gethynx');
π pp_add_isa
The pp_add_isa command works like the the pp_add_exported function. The arguments to pp_add_isa are added to the @ISA list, e.g.
pp_add_isa(' Some::Other::Class ');
π pp_bless
If your pp_def routines are to be used as object methods, use pp_bless to specify the package (i.e. the class) to which your pp_defed methods will be added. For example, pp_bless('PDL::MyClass'). The default is PDL if this is omitted β icon behaviour, honestly.
π₯ pp_addxs
Sometimes you want to add extra XS code of your own to the generated XS file β code that's generally not involved with any broadcasting/indexing issues but supplies some other functionality you want to access from the Perl side. For example:
pp_addxs('','
# Determine endianness of machine
int
isbigendian()
CODE:
unsigned short i;
PDL_Byte *b;
i = 42; b = (PDL_Byte*) (void*) &i;
if (*b == 42)
RETVAL = 0;
else if (*(b+1) == 42)
RETVAL = 1;
else
croak("Impossible - machine is neither big nor little endian!!\n");
OUTPUT:
RETVAL
');
Especiallypp_add_exportedandpp_addxsshould be used with care, bestie. PP usesPDL::Exporter, so letting PP export your function means they get added to the standard list of functions exported by default (the list defined by the export tag ``:Func''). And if you usepp_addxs, you shouldn't try to do anything that involves broadcasting or indexing directly β PP is much better at generating the appropriate code from your definitions. π
π pp_add_boot
Finally, you may want to add some code to the BOOT section of the XS file (if you don't know what that is, check perlxs). Supes easy with the pp_add_boot command:
pp_add_boot(<<EOB);
descrip = mylib_initialize(KEEP_OPEN);
if (descrip == NULL)
croak("Can't initialize library");
GlobalStruc->descrip = descrip;
GlobalStruc->maxfiles = 200;
EOB
π pp_export_nothing
By default, PP.pm puts all subs defined using the pp_def function into the output .pm file's EXPORT list. This can create problems if you're creating a subclassed object where you don't want any methods exported (i.e. the methods will only be called using the $object->method syntax).
For these cases you can call pp_export_nothing() to clear out the export list. Example (at the end of the .pd file):
pp_export_nothing();
pp_done();
π§ pp_core_importList
By default, PP.pm puts the 'use Core;' line into the output .pm file. This imports Core's exported names into the current namespace, which can create problems if you're over-riding one of Core's methods in the current file. You end up getting messages like "Warning: sub sumover redefined in file subclass.pm" when running the program. π
For these cases the pp_core_importList can be used to change what is imported from Core.pm. For example:
pp_core_importList('()')
This would result in
use Core();
being generated in the output .pm file. This would result in no names being imported from Core.pm. Similarly, calling
pp_core_importList(' qw/ barf /')
would result in
use Core qw/ barf/;
being generated in the output .pm file. This would result in just 'barf' being imported from Core.pm.
π pp_setversion
Simultaneously set the .pm and .xs files' versions, thus avoiding unnecessary version-skew between the two. To use this, simply do this in your .pd file, probably near the top:
our $VERSION = '0.0.3';
pp_setversion($VERSION);
# Then, in your Makefile.PL:
my @package = qw(FFTW3.pd FFTW3 PDL::FFTW3);
my %descriptor = pdlpp_stdargs(\@package);
$descriptor{VERSION_FROM} = 'FFTW3.pd'; # EUMM can parse the format above
However, don't use this if you use Module::Build::PDL. See that module's documentation for details. π
π pp_deprecate_module
If a particular module is deemed obsolete, this function can be used to mark it as deprecated. This has the effect of emitting a warning when a user tries to use the module. The generated POD for this module also carries a deprecation notice. The replacement module can be passed as an argument like this:
pp_deprecate_module( infavor => "PDL::NewNonDeprecatedModule" );
Note that this function affects only the runtime warning and the POD. Periodt.
π MAKING YOUR PP FUNCTION PRIVATE π
Let's say you have a function in your module called PDL::foo that uses the PP function bar_pp to do the heavy lifting. But you don't want to advertise that bar_pp exists. To do this, you must move your PP function to the top of your module file, then call
pp_export_nothing()
to clear the EXPORT list. To ensure that no documentation (even the default PP docs) is generated, set
Doc => undef
and to prevent the function from being added to the symbol table, set
PMFunc => ''
in your pp_def declaration (see Image2D.pd for an example). This will effectively make your PP function "private." However β and this is the important bit β it's always accessible via PDL::bar_pp due to Perl's module design. But making it private will cause the user to go very far out of their way to use it, so they shoulder the consequences! π
π SLICE OPERATION π
The slice operations require a much more intimate knowledge of PDL internals than the data operations. Furthermore, the complexity of the issues involved is considerably higher than that in the average data operation. Nevertheless, functions generated using the slice operations are at the heart of the index manipulation and dataflow capabilities of PDL. You can get started by reading the section on "P2Child". π¦
Also, there are a lot of dirty issues with virtual ndarrays and vaffines which we shall entirely skip here. Not today, satan. π
π₯ Slices and bad values
Slice operations need to be able to handle bad values. The easiest thing to do is look at Basic/Slices/slices.pd to see how this works.
Along with BadCode, there are also the BadBackCode and BadRedoDimsCode keys for pp_def. However, any EquivCPOffsCode should not need changing, since any changes are absorbed into the definition of the $EQUIVCPOFFS() macro (i.e. it is handled automatically by PDL::PP). Slay.
π Handling of warn and barf in PP Code π
For printing warning messages or aborting/dieing, you can call warn or barf from PP code. However, you should be aware that these calls have been redefined using C preprocessor macros to PDL->barf and PDL->warn. These redefinitions are in place to keep you from inadvertently calling perl's warn or barf directly, which can cause segfaults during pthreading (i.e. processor multi-threading). π Don't do it!!
PDL's own versions of barf and warn will queue-up warning or barf messages until after pthreading is completed, and then call the perl versions of these routines. Very considerate of them, honestly. π«Ά
See PDL::ParallelCPU for more information on pthreading.
NB As of 2.064, it is highly recommended that you do not callbarfat all in PP code, but instead use$CROAK(). This will return apdl_errorwhich will transparently be used to throw the correct exception in Perl code, but can be handled suitably by non-Perl callers.
β¨ MAKEFILES FOR PP FILES β¨
okay so bestie, if you're gonna generate a package from your PP file (the typical file extensions here are .pd or .pp for the files containing PP code), the easiest and safest move is to just let the Makefile handle generating all the appropriate commands for you. no cap. π«Ά
in the following we're gonna outline the typical format of a Perl Makefile that automatically builds and installs your package from a description in a PP file. most of the rules to build the xs, pm and other required files from the PP file are already predefined in the PDL::Core::Dev package. we literally just have to tell MakeMaker to use it. π
in most cases you can define your Makefile like this:
use PDL::Core::Dev; # Pick up development utilities
use ExtUtils::MakeMaker;
$package = ["mylib.pd",Mylib,PDL::Lib::Mylib,'',1];
%hash = pdlpp_stdargs($package);
$hash{OBJECT} .= ' additional_Ccode$(OBJ_EXT) ';
WriteMakefile(%hash);
sub MY::postamble { pdlpp_postamble($package); }
# additional_Ccode.c
#include "pdl.h"
void ppcp(PDL_Byte *dst, PDL_Byte *src, int len)
{
int i;
for (i=0;i<len;i++) *dst++=*src++;
}
so, the list in $package goes like this: first the PP source file name, then the prefix for the produced files, then the whole package name, then the package to add XS functions to (empty string if you wanna use the same as the PP functions), and finally a boolean to dictate whether to have PDL generate a separate C file for each PP function (for faster compilation). π₯
the last feature is opt-in, because you have to avoid duplicate symbols when linking the library (so separate out C functions into their own file). you can modify the hash in whatever way you like, but it would be reasonable to stay within some limits so that your package will continue to work with later versions of PDL. like, don't go feral with it. π
to make life even easier, PDL::Core::Dev defines the function pdlpp_stdargs that returns a hash with default values that can be passed (either directly or after appropriate modification) to a call to WriteMakefile. currently, pdlpp_stdargs returns a hash where the keys are filled in as follows:
(
'NAME' => $mod,
VERSION_FROM => $src,
'TYPEMAPS' => [&PDL_TYPEMAP()],
'OBJECT' => "$pref\$(OBJ_EXT)",
PM => {"$pref.pm" => "\$(INST_LIBDIR)/$pref.pm"},
MAN3PODS => {"$pref.pm" => "\$(INST_MAN3DIR)/$mod.\$(MAN3EXT)"},
'INC' => &PDL_INCLUDE(),
'LIBS' => [''],
'clean' => {'FILES' => "$pref.xs $pref.pm $pref\$(OBJ_EXT)"},
)
here, $src is the name of the source file with PP code, $pref the prefix for the generated .pm and .xs files, and $mod the name of the extension module to generate. π
if your VERSION_FROM provides a version, PP will use that to set the XS_VERSION. and if you need to influence the value of that variable so that XSLoader etc don't reject the loaded dynamic library, you can use this workaround in a pp_addpm (the BEGIN is because the bootstrap happens at runtime, and your code appears after that call, but with a BEGIN it will take place beforehand):
our $VERSION; BEGIN { $VERSION = '2.019106' };
our $XS_VERSION; BEGIN { $XS_VERSION = $VERSION };
iykyk. π
π INTERNALS π
the internals of the current version consist of a large table which gives the rules according to which things are translated, and the subs which implement these rules. it's giving very much "the blueprint" energy. β¨
later on, it would be good to make the table modifiable by the user so that different things may be tried. future goals, bestie.
[Meta comment: here will hopefully be more in the future; currently, your best bet will be to read the source code :-( or ask on the list (try the latter first) ]
like, the source code is right there, but honestly? try the list first. π
π C PREPROCESSOR MACROS π
as well as the above-mentioned PDL_BAD_CODE and PDL_IF_BAD(iftrue,iffalse), there are also PDL_IF_GENTYPE_REAL(iftrue,iffalse), PDL_IF_GENTYPE_UNSIGNED, and PDL_IF_GENTYPE_INTEGER:
$b() = PDL_IF_GENTYPE_INTEGER(0,NAN);
slay, macros. π¦
β¨ APPENDIX A: SOME KEYS RECOGNISED BY PDL::PP β¨
Okay bestie, this is the glossary part β every key you can hand to pp_def and what it actually does. Unless it says otherwise, all the arguments are strings. Let's go π«Ά
Pars
Defines the signature of your function. That's it, that's the whole vibe β it's the main character of pp_def β¨
OtherPars
Arguments that are not pdls. Default: nothing (empty, nada, zero). It's a semi-colon separated list, like:
OtherPars=>'int k; double value; PerlIO *fp'
Peep $COMP(x) for how this connects, and also the matching entry over in Appendix B. π¦
Code
The actual code that makes the functionality happen. Several PP macros and PP functions get recognised inside this string value, so it's not just plain C β it's C with lore π
HandleBad
If you set this to 1, the routine is assumed to support bad values, and the code in the BadCode key gets used whenever bad values are present. It also sets things up so you can actually use the $ISBAD() and friends macros. If you set it to 0, it causes the routine to print a warning if any of the input ndarrays have their bad flag set. Choose wisely π₯
BadCode
Gives the code to be used if bad values may be present in the input ndarrays. Only used if HandleBad => 1. If HandleBad is true and you don't supply BadCode, the Code section gets reused β on the assumption that it'll use #ifdef PDL_BAD_CODE to handle bad values. As of 2.073, you can also use PDL_IF_BAD(iftrue,iffalse). Convenient, right? π
GenericTypes
An array reference. The array can contain any subset of the one-character strings below, which specify which types your operation will accept. Meaning of each type:
Bβ signed byte (i.e. signed char)Sβ signed short (two-byte integer)Uβ unsigned shortLβ signed long (four-byte integer, int on 32 bit systems)Nβ signed integer for indexing ndarray elements (platform & Perl-dependent size)Qβ signed long long (eight byte integer)Fβ floatDβ doubleGβ complex floatCβ complex double
This is very useful (and important!) when interfacing an external library. Default: [qw/B S U L N Q F D/]. No cap, the default matters π
Inplace
Marks a function as being able to work inplace. The examples say it all:
Inplace => 1 if Pars => 'a(); [o]b();'
Inplace => ['a'] if Pars => 'a(); b(); [o]c();'
Inplace => ['a','c'] if Pars => 'a(); b(); [o]c(); [o]d();'
β οΈ If bad values are being used, you gotta take care to ensure the propagation of the badflag when inplace is being used β for instance, see the code forsetbadtovalinBasic/Bad/bad.pd. Don't skip this one bestie π
Doc
Used to specify a documentation string in Pod format. See PDL::Doc for the info on PDL documentation conventions.
π‘ Note: in the special case where the PP 'Doc' string is one line, this is implicitly used for the quick reference AND the documentation. Two birds, one string π
If you omit the Doc field, PP will generate default documentation for you (after all, it knows about the Signature).
If you really want the function NOT to be documented in any way at this point β like, for an internal routine, or because you're doing it elsewhere in the code β explicitly specify Doc=>undef. Explicitly, okay? π
BadDoc
Contains the text returned by the badinfo command (in perldl) or the -b switch to the pdldoc shell script. In many cases you won't need to specify this, since the information can be automatically created by PDL::PP. However β as befits computer-generated text, it's rather stilted; it may be much better to do it yourself! Your words, your voice, your slay π
NoPthread
Optional flag to indicate the PDL function should not use processor threads (i.e. pthreads or POSIX threads) to split up work across multiple CPU cores. Typically set this to 1 if the underlying PDL function is not threadsafe. If this option isn't present, then the function is assumed to be threadsafe.
π§΅ This option only applies if PDL has been compiled with POSIX threads enabled. Otherwise it's just vibes.
PMCode
pp_def('funcname',
Pars => 'a(); [o] b();',
PMCode => 'sub PDL::funcname {
return PDL::_funcname_int(@_) if @_ == 2; # output arg "b" supplied
PDL::_funcname_int(@_, my $out = PDL->null);
$out;
}',
# ...
);
PDL functions allow [o] ndarray arguments into which you want the output saved. This is handy because you can allocate an output ndarray once and reuse it many times; the alternative would be for PDL to create a new ndarray each time, which may waste compute cycles or, more likely, RAM. Reuse is the moment, periodt π
PDL functions check the number of arguments they're given, and call croak if given the wrong number. By default (with no PMCode supplied), any output arguments may be omitted, and PDL::PP provides code that can handle this by creating null objects, passing them to your code, then returning them on the stack. Iconic behaviour honestly.
If you do supply PMCode, the rest of PDL::PP assumes it'll be a string that defines a Perl function with the function's name in the pp_bless package (PDL by default). As the example implies, the PP-generated function name will change from <funcname>, to _<funcname>_int. As also shown above, you'll need to supply all ndarrays in the exact order specified in the signature: output ndarrays are not optional, and the PP-generated function will not return anything. So like, don't expect a lil bonus value back π
PMFunc
When pp_def generates functions, it typically defines them in the PDL package. Then, in the .pm file it generates for your module, it typically adds a line that essentially copies that function into your current package's symbol table with code that looks like this:
*func_name = \&PDL::func_name;
It's a little bit smarter than that (it knows when to wrap that sort of thing in a BEGIN block, for example, and if you specified something different for pp_bless), but that's the gist of it. If you don't care to import the function into your current package's symbol table, you can specify:
PMFunc => '',
PMFunc has no other side-effects, so you could use it to insert arbitrary Perl code into your module if you like. However, you should use pp_addpm if you want to add Perl code to your module. Just saying π
ReadDataFuncName
Allows overriding the default function-name, for reading data transformed by this operation. Mainly used internally to set it to "NULL", in which case a default affine-orientated function will be called instead. Very much an internal-kids-only situation π
WriteBackDataFuncName
As above, but for writing transformed data from a child of this transformation back to the parent when BackCode is supplied. Same energy, opposite direction π«
AffinePriv
Flag to indicate this is an affine transformation whose Priv (contents of the pdl_trans) contains data that will need allocating and freeing. Memory management realness π€
GlobalNew
If supplied, will prevent generation of an XS function, and assigns the generated C run function into the named slot in the Core struct.
π°οΈ This is not used as of 2.058, and instead the relevant C functions are in pdlaffine.c. So like, historical artifact energy.
P2Child
Forces Pars to be PARENT and CHILD, the function's GenericTypes to be all of them, no HaveBroadcasting or CallCopy, and turns on DefaultFlow (so do not supply any of those args). Intended for affine transformations with dataflow. It's a whole bundle deal, no substitutions π
DefaultFlow
If true, sets in the pdl_transvtable (see PDL::Internals) the iflags such that the trans will start with dataflow both forwards and backwards. Bidirectional bestie behaviour π
HaveBroadcasting
Default true. If so, generate code implementing broadcasting (see PDL::Indexing).
CallCopy
For parameters that get created, normally the PDL->initialize will be used (or on a subclass). If this is true (which is the default for simple functions i.e. 2-arg with 0-dim signatures), instead the first argument's copy method will be used. Copy-paste but make it semantics π
TwoWay
If true, sets in the pdl_transvtable (see PDL::Internals) the iflags such as to inform the trans's error checks connected to dataflow. Yes, plural iflags energy π₯
Identity
If true, sets RedoDims, EquivCPOffsCode, HandleBad, P2Child, TwoWay such that the function is a dataflowing identity transformation. One flag, five whole personality traits π
BackCode
For dataflowing functions, this value (which gets parsed) overrides the operation of that from children ndarrays to parents. The reverse-direction glow-up β¨
BadBackCode
Same but taking account of bad values. Bad values deserve their own backstory too π
EquivCPOffsCode
If supplied, allows concise control of copying to Child from Parent the data considered Equivalent at each given Offset (hence the name); the Code and BackCode will be generated from this. Short name, big job π
Example:
pp_def(
'_clump_int',
OtherPars => 'int n',
P2Child => 1,
RedoDims => # omitted
EquivCPOffsCode => '
PDL_Indx i;
for(i=0; i<$PDL(CHILD)->nvals; i++) $EQUIVCPOFFS(i,i);
',
);
See how tidy that is? One little loop and the copying logic is handled β the way that $EQUIVCPOFFS(i,i) just does that π¦
π Appendix B: PP macros and functions π
π Macros π
$variablename_from_sig()β access a pdl (by its name) that was specified in the signature.$COMP(x)β access a value in the private data structure of this transformation (mainly used to use an argument specified in theOtherParssection).$SIZE(n)β replaced at runtime by the actual size of a named dimension (as specified in the signature).$GENERIC()β replaced by the C type that is equal to the runtime type of the operation.$P(a)β a pointer to the data of the PDL namedain the signature. Useful for interfacing to C functions.$PP(a)β a physical pointer access to pdla; mainly for internal use.$TXYZ(AlternativeX,AlternativeY,AlternativeZ)β expansion alternatives according to runtime type of operation, where XXX is some string that is matched by/[BSULNQFD+]/.$PDL(a)β return a pointer to the pdl data structure (pdl *) of ndarraya.$ISBAD(a())β returns true if the value stored ina()equals the bad value for this ndarray. RequiresHandleBadbeing set to 1.$ISGOOD(a())β returns true if the value stored ina()does not equal the bad value for this ndarray. RequiresHandleBadbeing set to 1.$SETBAD(a())β setsa()to equal the bad value for this ndarray. RequiresHandleBadbeing set to 1.$PRIV()β to access fields in thepdl_trans, eg$PRIV(offs).$CROAK()β returns apdl_errorwith the supplied (var-args) message, adding the function name at the start, which will cause abarfwithin the Perl code. This is (as of 2.064) a change in PDL functions' API, so that callers can handle exceptions in their preferred way, which may not use Perl at all.$EQUIVCPOFFS()β copy from thePARENTparameter at the first given offset, to theCHILDparameter at the second given offset.$EQUIVCPTRUNC()β similar, but if the expression given as the third parameter is false, instead set theCHILD's value to 0.$DOCOMPALLOC()β allocates memory for anyComparrays, after their size has been determined, e.g. here after$COMP(whichdims_count)has been set:
Comp => 'PDL_Indx whichdims[$COMP(whichdims_count)]',
$DOPRIVALLOC()β as above, except the key isPriv; because it isPriv, this is only for entries in thepdl_transitself, and almost certainly only for operations whereAffinePrivis true.$SETNDIMS()β for affine transformations (specifically, ones which set P2Child to true), set the child'sndimsto the given value and allocate a suitably-sized array of dimension values.$SETDIMS()β similarly for affine transformations, after the above and then the actual dimension sizes are set, use this to resize the child ndarray to the right size.$SETDELTABROADCASTIDS()β similarly again, this sets the child'snbroadcastidsto the same as the parent's, allocates space for thebroadcastids, then sets the child's ones to the same as the parent's plus the given value.
To get a flavour of what broadcastids are for, in the normal way of things the first (0th) one in the parent is the highest dimension-number in it. See PDL::Indexing for more.
π functions π
loop(DIMS) %{ ... %}β loop over named dimensions; limits are generated automatically by PP.broadcastloop %{ ... %}β enclose following code in a broadcast loop.
As of 2.075, threadloop is a deprecated alias for this.
types(TYPES) %{ ... %}β execute following code if type of operation is any ofTYPES.
π¦ Appendix C: Functions imported by PDL::PP π¦
A number of functions are imported when you use PDL::PP. These include functions that control the generated C or XS code, functions that control the generated Perl code, and functions that manipulate the packages and symbol tables into which the code is created.
β¨ Generating C and XS Code β¨
PDL::PP's main purpose is to make it easy for you to wrap the broadcasting engine around your own C code, but you can do some other things, too.
pp_defβ used to wrap the broadcasting engine around your C code. Virtually all of this document discusses the use ofpp_def.pp_doneβ indicates you are done with PDL::PP and that it should generate its.xsand.pmfiles based upon the otherpp_*functions that you have called. This function takes no arguments.pp_addxsβ this lets you add XS code to your.xsfile. This is useful if you want to create Perl-accessible functions that invoke C code but cannot or should not invoke the broadcasting engine. XS is the standard means by which you wrap Perl-accessible C code. You can learn more atperlxs.pp_add_bootβ this function adds whatever string you pass to the XS BOOT section. The BOOT section is C code that gets called by Perl when your module is loaded and is useful for automatic initialization. You can learn more about XS and the BOOT section atperlxs.pp_addhdrβ adds pure-C code to your XS file. XS files are structured such that pure C code must come before XS specifications. This allows you to specify such C code.pp_boundscheckβ PDL normally checks the bounds of your accesses before making them. You can turn that on or off at runtime by settingMyPackage::set_boundscheck. This function allows you to remove that runtime flexibility and never do bounds checking. It also returns the current boundschecking status if called without any arguments.
NOTE: I have not found anything about bounds checking in other documentation. That needs to be addressed.
π Generating Perl Code π
Many functions imported when you use PDL::PP allow you to modify the contents of the generated .pm file. In addition to pp_def and pp_done, the role of these functions is primarily to add code to various parts of your generated .pm file.
pp_addpmβ adds Perl code to the generated.pmfile. PDL::PP actually keeps track of three different sections of generated code: the Top, the Middle, and the Bottom. You can add Perl code to the Middle section using the one-argument form, where the argument is the Perl code you want to supply. In the two-argument form, the first argument is an anonymous hash with only one key that specifies where to put the second argument, which is the string that you want to add to the.pmfile. The hash is one of these three:
{At => 'Top'}
{At => 'Middle'}
{At => 'Bot'}
For example:
pp_addpm({At => 'Bot'}, <<POD);
=head1 Some documentation
I know I'm typing this in the middle of my file, but it'll go at
the bottom.
=cut
POD
Warning: If, in the middle of your.pdfile, you put documentation meant for the bottom of your pod, you will thoroughly confuse CPAN. On the other hand, if in the middle of your.pdfile, you add some Perl code destined for the bottom or top of your.pmfile, you only have yourself to confuse. :-)
pp_beginwrapβ adds BEGIN-block wrapping. Certain declarations can be wrapped in BEGIN blocks, though the default behavior is to have no such wrapping.pp_addbeginβ sets code to be added to the top of your.pmfile, even above code that you specify withpp_addpm({At => 'Top'}, ...). Unlikepp_addpm, calling this overwrites whatever was there before. Generally, you probably shouldn't use it.
π§ Tracking Line Numbers π§
When you get compile errors, either from your C-like code or your Perl code, it can help to make those errors back to the line numbers in the source file at which the error occurred.
pp_line_numbersβ takes a line number and a (usually long) string of code. The line number should indicate the line at which the quote begins. This is usually Perl's__LINE__literal, unless you are using heredocs, in which case it is__LINE__ + 1. The returned string has#linedirectives interspersed to help the compiler report errors on the proper line.
π Modifying the Symbol Table and Export Behavior π
PDL::PP usually exports all functions generated using pp_def, and usually installs them into the PDL symbol table. However, you can modify this behavior with these functions.
pp_blessβ sets the package (symbol table) to which the XS code is added. The default is PDL, which is generally what you want. If you use the default blessing and you create a functionmyfunc, then you can do the following:
$ndarray->myfunc(<args>);
PDL::myfunc($ndarray, <args>);
On the other hand, if you bless your functions into another package, you cannot invoke them as PDL methods, and must invoke them as:
MyPackage::myfunc($ndarray, <args>);
Of course, you could always use the PMFunc key to add your function to the PDL symbol table, but why do that?
pp_add_isaβ adds to the list of modules from which your module inherits. The default list is:
qw(PDL::Exporter DynaLoader)
pp_core_importlistβ at the top of your generated.pmfile is a line that looks like this:
use PDL::Core;
You can modify that by specifying a string to pp_core_importlist. For example,
pp_core_importlist('::Blarg');
will result in
use PDL::Core::Blarg;
You can use this, for example, to add a list of symbols to import from PDL::Core. For example:
pp_core_importlist(" ':Internal'");
will lead to the following use statement:
use PDL::Core ':Internal';
pp_setversionβ sets your module's version. The version must be consistent between the.xsand the.pmfile, and is used to ensure that your Perl's libraries do not suffer from version skew.pp_add_exportedβ adds to the export list whatever names you give it. Functions created usingpp_defare automatically added to the list. This function is useful if you define any Perl functions usingpp_addpmorpp_addxsthat you want exported as well.pp_export_nothingβ this resets the list of exported symbols to nothing. This is probably better calledpp_export_clear, since you can add exported symbols after callingpp_export_nothing. When called just before callingpp_done, this ensures that your module does not export anything, for example, if you only want programmers to use your functions as methods.
πΈ SEE ALSO πΈ
- For the concepts of broadcasting and slicing check PDL::Indexing.
PDL::InternalsPDL::BadValuesfor information on bad valuesperlxs,perlxstut- Practical Magick with C, PDL, and PDL::PP -- a guide to compiled add-ons for PDL β
https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.07753
π BUGS π
Although PDL::PP is quite flexible and thoroughly used, there are surely bugs. First amongst them: this documentation needs a thorough revision.
β¨ AUTHOR β¨
Okay bestie, credit where credit is due, because these absolute icons wrote the thing π
- Copyright(C) 1997 Tuomas J. Lukka (
lukka@fas.harvard.edu), Karl Glaazebrook (kgb@aaocbn1.aao.GOV.AU), and Christian Soeller (c.soeller@auckland.ac.nz). All rights reserved. - Documentation updates Copyright(C) 2011 David Mertens (
dcmertens.perl@gmail.com).
And the legal bit, no cap: this documentation is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself π«Ά (yes, that's the whole license line, we're not skipping it, we keep the receipts around here).
Okay that's the whole page, you made it to the end! Go forth and write some PDL::PP code, the vibes are immaculate πβ¨
Signing off from the footer, where the real ones live: this is PP(1) from perl v5.32.1, dated 2022-04-11 π mwah, go touch some grass and then come back and vectorize something π
π¦ where this page comes from
- epel 9: perl-PDL 2.78.0-1.el9 Β· GPL+ or Artistic
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms